William Shakespeare of course :)))
He was witty
The larger goal was uniting Americans around the war effort.
Cracking down on dissent would be a negative action in support of the larger, positive goal the government sought. The government wanted a fully united public in support of the war, and so it put out the message that that freedom of speech might have its limits in times of war.
The correct answers are A) Hrothgar and his men. B) Beowulf and his men.
<em>The comitatus relationships that are shown in Beowulf are Hrothgar and his men and Beowulf and his men.
</em>
A comitatus relationship is an ancient term used for the first time in the epoch of the Roman Empire. It refers to the special relationship that rulers had with their servants that protected him. Later, in Anglo-Saxon stories, the term meant the respected relationships between the ruler and its thanes or personal guards, in Scotland. The relationship could be positive, instilling respect in people or it could be negative, instilling fear. In the case of Beowulf, the relationship is based on respect and honor.
1. Kennedy’s military policies encouraged more funding for <span>the Special Forces. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option.
2. "</span>Relations between the United States and Latin America did not improve" is the one outcome <span>of the Alliance for Progress. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option.</span>
Erasmus was a Dutch humanist who became a monk and a scholar with the many reformers of his time, Erasmus saw the leaders of his church abusing their powers.
