A rebuttal is a sort of countering something. For an author to cause his reply to become more grounded, he should point a rundown of defects on the given contention to balance it.
<h3>How can the writer revise the rebuttal to make it stronger? </h3>
Correct answer is option A.
- By rephrasing it as a conclusion.
- This will make it harder for the person who gave the assertion difficult to safeguard the case the individual in question is attempting to shield.
- The counterclaim has one significant component that the rejoinder doesn't, which is a solid and obvious source that upholds their position. In this way, the compose can make their reply more grounded by adding a measurement or citation.
Therefore, correct answer is option A.
For more information about rebuttal, refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/3959097
Answer:
1. When the world famous film director, Martin Jensen, decided to make a new film about the French revolution, everyone in Hollywood wanted to play the 1 lead role. That’s not surprising as Jensen’s films are always nominated for the 2 Academy Awards and often win them. This is not a typical Hollywood 3 blockbuster with millions of dollars spent on computer generated 4 special effects. This is a thoughtful drama which many film 5 reviews are already calling the best film of the 21st century.
Explanation:
This question demands some knowledge on vocabulary related to the movie industry. In a movie, when actors get to play the most important character, they have the lead role. One of the most important awards given to movies and those involved in their production is the Oscars, also known as the Academy Awards. Hollywood is know for producing movies referred to as blockbusters: successful movies that make tons of money worldwide. It is common for blockbusters to be action movies filled with special effects that make the impossible possible. The movie industry also relies a lot on good reviews, that is, opinions written by critics about the movies.
When writing a claim you need to take a stance on a particular issue. In this case the issue is whether or not "standardized tests are the proper measuring sticks for student performance." This stance should be the first part of your claim. Then follow it up with "because..." and your three reasons.
For example, Standardized tests are a proper measuring stick for student performance because they can test a student's knowledge on a wide range of subjects, they are the same for everyone, and they are an accurate indicator of how well a student will do in their future studies especially for fields like medicine and law.
Scientists are searching for planets that are similar to Earth because when resources are used up, we can resort to another planet. Whether it be to travel to live at a different planet or to collect resources from there, either option would be nice for a last resort.
