The type of verbal that appears in the sentence is: Infinitive
We can see in the sentence that the verb is not bound to any particular subject or tense
hope this helps
1. Eurylochus - troublemaker of Odysseus's crew
2. Sisyphus - cheated death twice.
3. Agamemnon - famously distrustful of women
4. Circe - tells Odysseus's future
5. Hermes - advises Odysseus on how to not become a pig
6. Zeus - destroyss Odysseus's ship with a thunderbolt.
7. Poseidon - destroys Odysseus's raft with a storm
8. Aeolus - master of winds
9. Antiphates - king of the Laestrygonians
10. Nausicaa - Phaeacian princess
<span>The correct answer is D stick to your subject. By sticking to your subject, you will essentially be writing with the purpose of upholding your thesis, or argument, which is the most important aspect of a paper. Option A is incorrect because this depends on the piece you're writing. For example, if you're writing a short story, then a description based on one of your senses would be excellent imagery. However, if you're writing an argument paper, it would be better to offer a description based on reputable sources. B and C are both incorrect, because you will want to include relevant details. You shouldn't take away details that would support your thesis, and you shouldn't add irrelevant details that would take away from your argument.</span>
“Do I have all the information that I need” and “have I found an answer to each of my questions?” Are the options that apply
(Answer:
2) Jumping on the trampoline, the applause began.
Explanation:
For example:
After reading the book, the movie made more sense.
^ Who read the book? This modifier is left dangling.
After reading the book, I thought the movie made sense.
^ 'I' Is catching the modifier here.
Therefore, sentence one (Of the example) includes the dangling modifier.
In the case of the question, who was jumping on the trampoline?
