John c. Calhoun was considered the "great compromiser" because he spearheaded the Missouri compromise as well as promoted an extensive economic plan called the "American system. "
This is FALSE.
Their so-called Great Compromise (the Connecticut Compromise in honor of Connecticut architects Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) envisaged a dual system of representation in Congress. In the House of Representatives, each state is allocated a number of seats in proportion to its population.
The Connecticut Compromise, also known as the Great Compromise, is in the history of the United States a compromise proposed by Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth during the drafting of the United States Constitution in Congress in 1787 to settle disputes between states large and small, It was meant to be resolved through representatives.
Learn more about great compromiser here:brainly.com/question/14190867
#SPJ4
Answer:
B. As rebels against the government
Explanation:
because they were
The school of thought does George most likely belong is in a French and Spanish school. George is studying Basque, a language spoken by a group of people who live in the Pyrenees mountain range between France and Spain. He’s studying the history of this language to determine how its complex grammar evolved from other languages.
Answer:
t = 6 hours
Explanation:
Given that,
The speed of a car, v = 60 km/hr
We need to find the time it will take to cover 360 km at the same speed. We know that,
Speed = distance/time

So, the car will take 6 hours to cover 360 km.
Abolitionists wanted the Dred Scott case to be heard by the courts because this would bring slavery to the forefront and Congress would be forced to deal with the issue. Why? Well, see below for an explanation!
Let’s start by addressing what the Dred Scott case was and how it affected former slaves and blacks as a whole. The Dred Scott v. Sanford case was a situation that occurred during the times of slavery (year of 1857). Dred Scott’s slave owner passed away and Scott offered that he buy his freedom. The Chief Justice in court at the time sought an opportunity to settle that blacks were inferior. When the case was heard in Supreme Court, the ruling came out explicitly that black people were inferior and had no rights as far as the white man. Under these circumstances, it was implied that Dred Scott could not purchase his freedom as could a white man. Abolitionists also saw this as an opportunity though because they wanted the conflict of slavery to be addressed publicly and with a straightforward response/resolution. If you need any extra help, let me know and I will gladly assist you.