1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marianna [84]
3 years ago
9

What was commutation in the context of the military draft? A. Commutation allowed people to pay $300 to avoid the draft. B. Comm

utation was a tactic of rioters trying to end the draft. C. Commutation allowed criminals to serve in the army instead of going to prison. D. Commutation allowed people to move to Canada to avoid the draft.
History
2 answers:
Sonbull [250]3 years ago
6 0
A allowed people to pay 300 dollars to avoid draft
liubo4ka [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:  A. Commutation allowed people to pay $300 to avoid the draft

Explanation:

Hope it helps

You might be interested in
How does Godkin view the blacks who have been put in charge of the governments of the South?
otez555 [7]

Answer:

In this my latest blog on the history of Irish America, I go back again to the 19th century and to the life of the Irish-born editor and political commentator, Edwin Lawrence Godkin. Now a forgotten figure, in his heyday between the 1860s and 1890s he was influential and well-connected, numbering the writer Henry James among his many prominent American friends and associates.

During the British General Election of 2017, a leading politician caused a brief media stir (and a dash to consult reference books on 19tth century American history) by dismissing an opponent as a 'mutton-headed old Mugwump'. Could he, perhaps, have been thinking of the prominent Irish Mugwump, Edwin Lawrence Godkin?

It was some years ago while I was researching an article on Irish-born journalist, William Howard Russell's newspaper reports from the Crimean War (‘Men at War: 19th century Irish war correspondents from the Crimea to China' in History Ireland Vol. 15, No. 2, March/April 2007) that I came across E. L. Godkin, who was born in Moyne, Co. Wicklow in 1831 and studied at Queens University, Belfast. He was the son of a Congregationalist Minister who was dismissed from his post on account of his support for the repeal of the Act of Union and his association with the Young Ireland movement of the 1840s. Rev. James Godkin was a significant figure in his own right, who advocated agrarian and church reform, two hotly contested political issues in 19th century Ireland. During his career as a journalist, he became editor of the Dublin Daily Express and Irish correspondent of the London Times.

Edwin Godkin evidently inherited his father's literary bent. He was still in his 20s when he published a sympathetic and well-regarded history of Hungary in which he eloquently described the influential conservative Austrian statesman, Prince Metternich, as 'one of the ablest high priests that ever ministered at the altar of absolutism."

Godkin made a name for himself reporting on the Crimean War for the London Daily News. His reports from the battlefront contain more gore than glory. Here's how vividly he described the aftermath of the fighting at Eupatoria in February 1855.

"Men lay on every side gashed and torn by those frightful wounds which round-shot invariably inflict. Here a gory trunk, looking as if the head had

been wrenched from the shoulders by the hand of a giant …another cut in

two as if by a knife and his body doubled up like a strip of brown paper."

After his return from the Crimea, Godkin worked in Belfast for the liberal newspaper, the Northern Whig and then left for the United States in 1856. In the period before the Civil War, he paid a visit to the American South which he viewed unsympathetically. On the issue of slavery, although he had little feeling for its victims, he was unequivocal. It was, he said, a "foul and monstrous" wrong.

At the end of the Civil War, Godkin turned his hand to the newspaper business and became the co-founder and editor of The Nation (whose title recalls the Young Ireland movement's journal that Godkin would have remembered from his youth), a weekly publication based in New York which has been described as "the most influential liberal weekly" during America's gilded age. Godkin edited the Nation until 1881 when it merged with the New York Evening Post which he went on to edit from 1883 until 1899 when he retired from journalism.

During his years in journalism, Godkin was a combative, controversial figure much given to polemical forays. Although the Nation's original backers were individuals with radical views, Godkin and the paper he edited took an increasingly conservative stance. The paper's motto was: 'to govern well, govern little.' He argued that Government "must let trade, and commerce, and manufacturers, and steamboats, and railroads, and telegraphs alone". Government's job as he saw it was simply to maintain order and administer justice. As an influential editor, he campaigned for low tariffs, a hard currency, civil service reform, independence in politics and international peace while battling against his prime political phobias: imperialism, profligate spending and corruption in government.

Godkin's most influential phase was as a proponent of the Mugwump movement, whose star shone briefly during the closing decades of the 19th century, but failed to make a lasting impact on the US party system. The Mugwumps were a group of high-minded, middle class, reformist Republicans who were appalled by the machine politics and the graft that flourished in American cities in the latter part of the 19th century.

The Mugwumps made their most significant contribution to American politics when they turned their backs on the Republican candidate, James G. Blaine, and helped Grover Cleveland become the 22nd President of the United States in 1884. Cleveland was the first Democrat to be elected President since James Buchanan (1857-1861).

C.

3 0
3 years ago
Why did Jackson oppose the re-charter of the Bank of the United States? A) It increased the money in circulation. B) It allowed
natali 33 [55]

Answer:C-It unfairly foreclosed farmers' land and homes.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The manner in which a question is asked can influence the outcome of a poll.
vladimir2022 [97]
The Following answer I will say is False
7 0
2 years ago
As an immigrant to America, why would assimilation be challenging? Write at least one or two sentences to explain your answer.
goldenfox [79]

Answer:

Assimilation would be challenging because you already bring a culture with you and you'd might see no reason to celebrate America's culture when you already have your own culture that you celebrate and love.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How can political instability make genocide more likely
aleksley [76]
Preventing genocide is one of the greatest challenges facing the international community.[1]<span> Aside from the suffering and grief inflicted upon generations of people and the catastrophic social, economic and political dislocations that follow, this ‘crime of crimes’ has the potential to destabilize entire regions for decades (Bosco, 2005). The shockwaves of Rwanda’s genocide are still felt in the eastern parts of the Democratic Republic of Congo nearly 20 years later, for example. Considerable resources are now devoted to the task of preventing genocide. In 2004 the United Nations established the Office of the Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide with the purpose to ‘raise awareness of the causes and dynamics of genocide, to alert relevant actors where there is a risk of genocide, and to advocate and mobilize for appropriate action’ (UN 2012). At the 2005 World Summit governments pledged that where states were ‘manifestly failing’ to protect their populations from ‘war crimes, genocide, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity’ the international community could step in a protect those populations itself (UN, 2012). The ‘responsibility to protect’ (R2P) project, designed to move the concept of state sovereignty away from an absolute right of non-intervention to a moral charge of shielding the welfare of domestic populations, is now embedded in international law (Evans 2008). Just this year, the United States government has stated that ‘preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States,’ and that ‘President Obama has made the prevention of atrocities a key focus of this Administration’s foreign policy’ (Auschwitz Institute, 2012). Numerous scholars and non-government organisations have similarly made preventing genocide their primary focus (Albright and Cohen, 2008; Genocide Watch, 2012).</span>
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How does the Constitution distribute power?
    13·1 answer
  • Why was Persia ultimately unsuccessful in conquering Greece?
    12·1 answer
  • What happened to the continents of Europe and Asia as result of the Atlantic Slave Trade?
    9·1 answer
  • Which best describes peasant life in fifteenth-century russia?
    10·2 answers
  • What are the main characteristics of chivalry?
    14·1 answer
  • What was the United States' response to Japanese aggression in Asia in
    12·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    13·1 answer
  • During the battle of Vicksburg, what new technology was first used by both the North and the South?
    13·2 answers
  • Why did Italy resent foreign powers after the Treaty of Versailles?
    6·1 answer
  • True or false Knossos was a Phoenician capital city that was the center of an advanced and
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!