1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jenyasd209 [6]
3 years ago
7

Explain the causes and effects of the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears.

History
1 answer:
Gennadij [26K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Cause: There was also some argument that the Native Americans may raid nearby plantations, causing many of the farmers to protest their presence. Eventually, president Andrew Jackson, decided to pass the Indian removal acts in 1830, which allowed him to move the Indians west. Since Andrew Jackson had grown up on a plantation where Indian raids were common, he had a negative view of them, saying that "they are inferior to whites". The president had very little problem with sending them away, and in 1838 put the trail of tears into action.

Effect: One major effect is that the Native American population severely decreased. While on the Trail of Tears, many Native Americans endured hypothermia, starvation, and sickness. More than 4,000 natives died due to these conditions, leaving the Native American population hanging by a thread. The other major effect is that since there was only a handful of Indians that survived the horrible journey, the culture quickly became, and still is today, on the verge of extinction.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The U.S. Appeals Court has decided that it is not an invasion of a suspect's privacy to be asked for a DNA sample when brought i
Orlov [11]
The answer to this question is:

True.
3 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between covert and overt oppression?
ryzh [129]

B.

Covert oppression is less noticeable and overt oppression is observable action.

3 0
3 years ago
Is it possible to balance the pursuit of private goods with the need to promote the public good? Is this balance a desired goal?
ankoles [38]

<u>Answer:</u>

Yes, it is possible to balance the pursuit of private goods over public goods and this balance is a desirable goal.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The pursuit of private goods over public goods can be balanced with the help of various government policies and taxes. This balance is a desirable goal in order to maintain the economic growth of each strata in the society. It enables the below poverty line strata to have access to the basic necessities. Though private goods provide fast economic growth, public goods offer the wholistic growth of the economy.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following individuals would mostly likely write a biased newspaper article critizing a politician running for presi
Dahasolnce [82]
Have u found the answer yet lol


7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement does NOT describe a difference between the Confederate Constitution and the U.S. Constitution? A. The Confederat
Lina20 [59]
C. The confederate constitution did not allow for multiple political parties.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the time of this excerpt from truth ain’t I a woman
    14·1 answer
  • How did Battuta’s faith affect his travels and his interactions with other Muslims?
    12·2 answers
  • Why does the president appoint supreme court justices that have the same views?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the scientific method?
    9·1 answer
  • Explain why a market economy offers more economic freedom and consumer choice?
    14·1 answer
  • What did the founding fathers think about efficiency in government? Explain.
    14·2 answers
  • Compare and contrast two types of campaign ads
    9·1 answer
  • What led to heatlh concerns in China? (plato)
    15·1 answer
  • What are the 6 summaries of the heliocentric model?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the Ghaznavid presence impact the Hindu people
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!