1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Akimi4 [234]
3 years ago
6

Which constitution action starts with process by which a president is removed from office

History
2 answers:
mash [69]3 years ago
3 0
To rid a president from office is to be impeached.
svp [43]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The constitutional action that starts the process by which a president is removed from office is the impeachment.

Explanation:

The impeachment is a procedure allowing the legislative power to dismiss a high rank official. The accused may be a senior government official, which includes the president and his vice-president, cabinet members (secretaries) and federal judges. The purpose of impeachment is to allow for the removal of officials from office.

The procedure has three stages:

-the investigation, generally conducted by the Judicial Committee of the United States House of Representatives;

-impeachment, which must be voted on by the House of Representatives by a simple majority (like a law);

-the impeachment trial, which is held before the United States Senate, chaired by the Vice President, or by the President of the Supreme Court if the President is tried; the guilty decision can only be acquired by a two-thirds majority.

You might be interested in
Which statement best describes Africa immediately after the end of World War II?
VLD [36.1K]

Many African nations demanded that colonial governments grant them their independence.

7 0
3 years ago
Which issue did all delegates agree with in the Constitutional Convention? how to count enslaved people for representation the n
Yuri [45]

Answer:

<h2>Hi mate PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST IF MY ANSWER IS CORRECT PLEASE </h2>

Explanation:

The three-fifths compromise was an agreement reached by the state delegates at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. Under the compromise, every enslaved American would be counted as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes.

Origins of the Three-Fifths Compromise

At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, the founders of the United States were in the process of forming a union. Delegates agreed that the representation each state received in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College would be based on population, but the issue of slavery was a sticking point between the South and the North.

It benefitted Southern states to include enslaved people in their population counts, as that calculation would give them more seats in the House of Representatives and thus more political power. Delegates from Northern states, however, objected on the grounds that enslaved people could not vote, own property, or take advantage of the privileges that White men enjoyed. (None of the lawmakers called for the end of slavery, but some of the representatives did express their discomfort with it. George MAS on of VIRG inia called for anti-slave trade laws, and Gouverneur Morris of New York called slavery “a nefarious institution.”)

Ultimately, the delegates who objected to enslavement as an institution ignored their moral QUAL-ms in favor of unifying the states, thus leading to the creation of the three-fifths compromise.

5 0
2 years ago
In a democracy what can't the will of majority do
slava [35]
Pick the president! Hope this Helps :-)
5 0
3 years ago
The line-item veto challenges the notion of A) senatorial courtesy B) congressional oversight C) federalism D) executive privile
Alex777 [14]

Answer:  E) separation of powers

Explanation:

The Line-item veto is a provision that allows an Executive authority such as a Governor or the President to cancel out parts of a bill enacted by Congress without having to veto the whole thing. Essentially it is a partial veto power that allows them to veto a bill only in part should they please.

Governors in 45 US States have this right but the President of the United States does not.

It is argued that this provision violates the principle of Separation of Powers amongst the Judiciary, the Legislature and the Executive.

This is because the Legislature should have exclusive power to construct the inner texts of a bill and the Executive should not be able to alter this content.

6 0
4 years ago
A powerful committee of the us senate charged with finding ways to raise federal revenues is the
Crazy boy [7]
A powerful committee of the us senate charged with finding ways to raise federal revenues is the "Ways and Means Committee". This committee is usually made up of both Democrats and Republicans. 
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Was there any punishment for killing someone (not patricide) in Ancient Rome?
    11·1 answer
  • One of the most significant innovations in building design introduced by the _________ was concrete, which made construction of
    14·2 answers
  • What was Germany's role in world war 1
    7·2 answers
  • What are some facts about vietnam?
    5·1 answer
  • What did the 1st and 2nd industrial revolution have in common
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these actions was a provisions of the treaty of Versailles
    13·1 answer
  • 5. Saddam Hussien was compared and we believed that we prevented him from becoming the next what (answer must be all lower case)
    5·1 answer
  • The four railroads that served Washington included
    12·1 answer
  • Which American victory convinced the French to join the war on the side of the colonists?
    6·2 answers
  • Evaluate the impact of the following problem solving techniques: Delphi &amp; Force-field analysis​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!