1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oksanka [162]
3 years ago
11

Sheridan Company sells its product for $7100 per unit. Variable costs per unit are: manufacturing, $4400, and selling and admini

strative, $100. Fixed costs are: $18000 manufacturing overhead, and $24000 selling and administrative. There was no beginning inventory at 1/1/18. Production was 20 units per year in 2018–2020. Sales were 20 units in 2018, 16 units in 2019, and 24 units in 2020. Income under absorption costing for 2020 is
Business
1 answer:
Minchanka [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

                 Sheridan Company

                  Income Statement

  For the year ended December 31, 202x

Sales revenue                                $170,400

Cost of goods sold                      <u>($129,600)</u>

Gross profit                                     $40,800

Period costs                                  <u>($24,000)</u>

Operating income                           $16,800

cost of goods manufactured 2019 (or 2020, it is the same)= (20 x $4,500) + $18,000 = $108,000 / 20 = $5,400 per unit

COGS 2020 = 24 x $5,400 = $129,600

sales revenue = 24 x $7,100 = $170,400

You might be interested in
A job advertisement reads as follows: "Wanted, bright young men to sell athletic club memberships. Interested applicants should
ohaa [14]

Answer:

The group of options for this question are the following:

A. Yes, the ad makes clear the type of employee sought.

B. No, it is not acceptable as it discriminates against female applicants and does not give sufficient information about the organization or job requirements.

C. No, it is not acceptable as it discriminates against female applicants.

D. Yes, it is acceptable but would benefit from more information.

The correct answer is B. No, it is not acceptable as it discriminates against female applicants and does not give sufficient information about the organization or job requirements.

Explanation:

The basic concept when the company considers the publication of a job offer to fill a position, is to find the best possible candidate, the most qualified for what is sought. For this, the development of the offer is very important, in what terms it is being proposed, to which applicants it is directed, etc. If the job offer is created properly, it will not only get the applicant to the most capable position, but it will do so in the shortest possible time.

An effective offer must have a title that appeals, that contains added value, either because it brings a certain prestige to the position, excellent conditions for it or the image of an important professional projection within the company. For this, in order to attract the candidate's attention to the position, the text of the offer must be close and pleasant, with respectful but appealing language.

8 0
3 years ago
According to the value in diversity problem-solving approach A. surface-level diversity is less likely to lead to team cohesion
marshall27 [118]

Answer:

The correct answer is option E (diversity in teams is beneficial because it provides for a larger pool of knowledge from which a team can draw as it carries out its work).

Explanation:

Diversity in an organization/team is broad in its definition as it describes a group of individuals who are from different backgrounds, races, ages, education working for a common goal.

When we talk about surface-level diversity, then we are pointing at those visible differences such as sex, age. While Deep-level diversity is those characters that are not visible such as beliefs, likes, dislikes, temperament.

Diversity in teams is beneficial because team members would have diverse backgrounds, experiences, problem-solving capacities, exposures, bringing diverse solutions to the team which leads to good team performance, and a quick, better solution to problems.

3 0
3 years ago
Recher Corporation uses part Q89 in one of its products. The company's Accounting Department reports the following costs of prod
DedPeter [7]

Answer:

Recher Corporation:

a) Financial impact of buying part Q89:

i) Relevant costs for In-house production of part Q89 are the avoidable costs:

Direct materials - $7.60

Direct labour - $4.20

Variable overhead - $8.30

Supervisor's salary $3.20

Avoidable general overhead - $0.81

Avoidable cost = $24.11 per unit

Total = $24.11 x 6,200 = $149,482

ii) Relevant cost of buying outside equals outside price minus additional segment savings = (6,200 x $27) - $15,600 = $151,800

When i) is compared with ii), it shows that it would cost more to buy outside ($151,800) than to produce the part in-house ($149,482).

b) The alternative the company should choose is to produce in-house.

Explanation:

a) The avoidable general overhead of $0.81 was obtained by dividing $5,000 of general overhead by 6,200 units, i.e. $5,000 / 6,200.

b) The depreciation for the special equipment is not included as it is not relevant.  It must be incurred no matter the option chosen.

c) The relevant cost of buying the part outside was reduced by $15,600 since this amount would be realized as additional margin with the choice.

d) |n making cost decisions, relevant and avoidable costs are considered.  Any cost that will be incurred notwithstanding the choice made is not relevant.  Such costs are unavoidable.  For example, the depreciation on the equipment.

5 0
3 years ago
Tangible assets as well as intangible assets of a business need to be assessed for proper venture evaluation.
PilotLPTM [1.2K]
I think it's a. True




7 0
3 years ago
Seth Bullock, the owner of Bullock Gold Mining, is evaluating a new gold mine in South Dakota, Dan Dority, the company’s geologi
boyakko [2]

Answer:

NPV is $28.5 million

Payback is 4.31 years

IRR is 13.25%

MIRR is 12.51%

Explanation:

The NPV,payback period,Internal rate of return and modified internal rate of return were computed in the attached spreadsheet.

Payback period=the year of the first positive cumulative cash flow+the year cumulative cash flow/the next year cash flow

the year of first positive cumulative flow is year 4

the cumulative cash flow for year 4 is $66 m

the next year cash flow is(year 5) is $210

payback=4.31

Download xlsx
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Taking a physical count of inventory
    11·1 answer
  • After being introduced to a higher-priced washing machine, the customer expresses a desire to purchase a lower-priced item. when
    12·1 answer
  • A recent innovation by amazon, the vendor flex program, seeks to lower overall transportation costs but also creates new forms o
    6·1 answer
  • Coronado Company purchased land for $80,000. The company also paid $12,000 in accrued taxes on the property, incurred $5,000 to
    7·1 answer
  • The law of supply relates to opportunity cost because:__________
    14·2 answers
  • Marshall Officer is a stockholder in Endrun Investments, which is organized as a C Corporation. Endrun recently lost a major cou
    13·1 answer
  • The yield to maturity (YTM) on 1-year zero-coupon bonds is 7% and the YTM on 2-year zeros is 8%. The yield to maturity on 2-year
    14·1 answer
  • After a business designates categories of expense in its budget, it a: applies a formula. b: appoints an accountant. c: allocate
    15·1 answer
  • Consider an economy that produces only chocolate bars. In year 1, the quantity produced is 2 bars and the price is $5. In year 2
    7·1 answer
  • kari’s boss has offered to pay her for up to 5 hours of overtime today. akari has already been working for 10 hours and is decid
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!