Thomas Hobbes thinks that government is completely necessary for two reasons that if there were no control over people, humans would be in their natural state, where everyone can pursue power and all the assets needed for a decent life. the second thing he believes in is that people have a natural tendency to want power, and win by hurting others in the way in trying to obtain that goal. Having anarchy would lead to fighting and wars, so when life is lived in this way it would be short, rough, horrific, and wild. Thomas Hobbes’s ideal government is described in his book Leviathan.
Answer:
The answer is - Walls around the city provided protection from enemies, a moat filled with water from the Euphrates River surrounded the city and natural ladnforms offered protection from invaders.
Explanation:
Nebuchadnezzar fortified the city of Babylon and the area that was protected amounted to about 500 acres. The city was impenetrable for that day and age. Not only did it have a protective purpose but an esthetic one as well. The gates were adorne with glazed bricks depicting animals such as bulls, lions and dragons. In addition to this he made a moat and filled with water from the Euphrates River surrounded the city. To the north the city was protected by the Euphrates river and had massive bridges along these rivers that were built up with battlements.
Answer:
It is located in the northeast corner of Washington
Answer:
It was an English company formed for the exploitation of trade with East and Southeast Asia and India. Although it started as a monopolistic trading body, it became involved in politics and acted as an agent of British imperialism in India from the early 18th century to the mid-19th century.
Explanation:
Answer:
Accountability to the law
Explanation:
In legal studies, accountability refers to the state of having to answer to the law. A person is accountable or liable to the law when some legal rule exists under which the person could find himself liable in a civil law suit or culpable in a criminal matter. In this example, the state official is accountable to the law, which means that he should be held responsible for breaking it.
