<span>The most basic difference lies in their view of human nature. For Hobbes, humans are eager of power and under the state of nature we tend to kill each other. For this reason, we need a social contract (in order to survive). For Locke, the state of nature is not as pessimistic as Hobbes. We can colaborate, but the problem is in property. Locke wrote something like when we have issues of who is the owner of what (specially under scarcity) we need the social contract protecting our work materialized as property.
I recommend you Hobbes' Leviathan and Locke's Second Treatise of Government. It is everything there and quite clearer than I have tried to explain it.</span>
the answer is b
Explanation:
because being true means being loyal
The 15th amendment that allowed African men the right to vote only men though no women.
3. patricians would often interpret the laws in their favor, so having a written set of laws made this more difficult to do.
The correct answer is "France's King Phillip Vl snatched land from King Edward III and retaliation had to follow".
When King Charles IV of France died, there was uncertainty over who had to be his successor, as there was a principle within the kingdom of France that a woman could not be heir to the throne. Therefore, Isabella of France, sister of Charles IV alleged that the rightful successor was King Edward III of England. This claim was neglected by the French and they subsequently named Philip, Count of Valois, who was the cousin of Charles IV, as king of France.
After a series of disagreements between the 2 Kings, Philip VI decided to confiscate lands that belonged to Edward III. This caused Edward III to reassert his claim of being King of France and the 100 Years War started.
