1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jenyasd209 [6]
3 years ago
11

This is about the show Criminal Minds. “Think about some of the characters you viewed in the Criminal Minds episode. We had Ches

ter, the inmate on death row for the abuse and murder of dozens of women. We had Joey, the special needs "clown" who accidentally committed a murder 20 years earlier. We had Joey's father, who protected Joey's identity all this time. Can Joey be considered a criminal - just like Chester? Should Joey's father be penalized for protecting his son? How much accountability should fall on a special needs person's shoulders? How about their care takers? How do you think a scenario like this should play out in a court of law? Defend your answers clearly in a well-written, developed response.”- pls pls help me with this. Thank you :)
English
2 answers:
OLEGan [10]3 years ago
4 0

In this particular episode of Criminal Minds (Season 3, episode 14- "Damaged"), Agent Rossi is intent on solving a 20 year old cold case of a double homicide in which three children found their parents murdered with an axe. We later learn that Joey, a "clown" at a carnival had followed one of the children the day before and wanted to play with her. He went to her house and accidentally entered the parent's room. The father attacked Joey with the axe and Joey got angry and accidentally killed them. His father protected him and cleaned up any evidence at the crime scene.

Also, in the episode, we learn some about serial killer Chester Hardwick who murdered at least 23 woman. He seemed not to care about his victims, but once he decided he was going to murder them, he stated that they "didn't have a chance." He even attempts to attack the FBI agents in the room that were interrogating him for a serial killer profile before he was to be executed on death row. He believed that if he killed them that he wouldn't be executed next week.

Both committed murders and are by definition criminals. That being said, it is not fair to compare Joey and Chester's crimes or categorize them the same. Joey is developmentally disabled and did not plan to commit the murders. He is bigger and stronger than he knows and his reaction to being attacked was to get angry and fight back. This resulted, sadly, in death to both of the parents, in which Joey instantly felt regret. However, Chester's murders were premeditated and he clearly didn't show remorse for his actions.

In terms of the law, however, both did commit crimes. Joey should be accountable for his actions. In a court of law, justice should be served.  Simply because the criminal is developmentally disabled, doesn't mean he should walk free. However, the punishment should be less than Chester and be appropriate for his developmental age. Perhaps, a court would send him to an institution instead of prison.

Lastly, Joey's father should also be held accountable for protecting his son. Regardless of the circumstances, he aided a criminal and left three children without an answer to why their parents were murdered. The father should be tried in court and punished as per the law. It is the court's responsibility to punish the criminal, in this case, Joey, not the father's. However in most cases, the father, or any caretaker, should not be punished for the act of the crime itself. It is impossible to monitor and oversee someone's every move.

matrenka [14]3 years ago
3 0
First of all we can not compare Chester, a serial killer, with Joey, who committed a murder without intent, the intention defines the type of crime, and consequently the penalty that it must be met. Joey should not be considered a criminal because he has no criminal mind, and his action was not planned, in addition to having special needs, which places him in a possible state of no criminal responsibility, that will depend on the level and type of disability he possess. According to the laws, parents are not obliged to disclose their children, but there is a responsibility regarding the obstruction of justice, and his father could respond criminally. In this case, you must ask for the acquittal of the penalty for the disability, but at the same time, the clarification of the circumstances to grant justice to those affected.
You might be interested in
Im not sure what the answers is
shtirl [24]

Answer:

D) The Brown case addresses whether facilities separated by race are permissible by law.

Explanation:

The Brown case deals with the question of whether local governments have the ability to categorize people based on their race.

3 0
2 years ago
Which best describes the author’s viewpoint about the people who learned to decipher the Enigma in The Enigma Machine?
jarptica [38.1K]
The statement that best describes the author’s viewpoint about the people who learned to decipher the Enigma in The Enigma Machine is that (B)They played a very significant role in helping Allied forces. 

Here are the following choices:
A.They deserved more recognition for their service than they got. 
B.They played a very significant role in helping Allied forces. 
C.They should not have tricked the Germans by sending false codes. 
D.They were not as important as the soldiers on the battlefield.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"Letter from Birmingham Jail" communicates the main idea that Question 4 options:
statuscvo [17]

it is right and just to protest for people's civil rights

Explanation:

“Letter from Birmingham jail” was written by Martin Luther King Junior. He remains very popular of his advocacy for civil rights of oppressed peoples.  

In his letters, he has targeted two audiences at the same time. They were clergy class as well as an oppressed class. Throughout his letter, he mentions that there is nothing wrong in peacefully protesting for social justice. Freedom is never sought to be given voluntarily by the oppressing class. He also mentions apathy of the American commoners to this discrimination.

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a fire safety precaution
slava [35]

A; start fires with kindling or other fire starters

Why? because this is causing a fire, which is not a safety precaution.

Hope this helps!

-Payshence

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which best explains why Sunjata is considered an epic poem? a. It does not contain a hero b. It tells a long narrative story c.
Kamila [148]
A - incorrect as it does have a hero.
B - correct. The fact that it tells a long narrative story, among other things (like that it tells the story of the hero) makes it an epic poem.
C - incorrect as it is one long story
D - incorrect, using words in a poetic manner is not enough to consider writing an epic poem.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • . Bill drives more carelessly than he used to.
    15·1 answer
  • Someone who inhabits a place is an
    12·2 answers
  • . Which of the following is a strategy for using rhetorical language in public speaking A. varying the rate at which you speak B
    11·2 answers
  • Examine the following citations for hypothetical books about the Roman
    10·1 answer
  • A police car drives 100 miles in 75 minutes what is its average sbeed in miles per hour?
    10·2 answers
  • And slumbrous waters pool a slumbrous world; Which of the following is true of the text in bold?
    6·1 answer
  • Read the sentence. We walked together to the rehearsal hall. Which rewritten sentence begins with a prepositional phrase? A. We
    15·2 answers
  • 1. We knew that we would win the game, and we did,
    11·1 answer
  • Why is it important to know our treaties responsibilities?
    8·1 answer
  • Money is a important thing?<br><br> a true<br> or<br> b false
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!