We can combine the two sentences by making the second sentence an adjective clause as "Forests cover 31% of Ohio, which has at least 99 tree species."
<h3>What is an adjective clause?</h3>
We can define an adjective clause as having the following characteristics:
- It is a dependent or subordinate clause.
- It contains a subject and a predicate.
- It often begins with relative pronouns, such as "which" or "that".
- It functions like an adjective, providing information about a noun.
In order to combine the sentences provided in the question and make the second sentence an adjective clause, we simply replace the noun "Ohio" with a relative pronoun. Thus:
- Sentence 1: Forests cover 31% of Ohio.
- Sentence 2: Ohio has at least 99 tree species.
- Combined sentences: Forests cover 31% of Ohio, which has at least 99 tree species.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answer provided above is correct.
Learn more about adjective clauses here:
brainly.com/question/1047465
#SPJ1
Well, I believe I could answer this question since I am a graphic designer. Just remember to rephrase this a bit please.
1. As a designer, I have learned that your work doesn't speak for itself, you do. You must show/tell people about your work and how you feel about it.
2. Remember your "Why?". When your at the point of almost giving up, think about the purpose of the project or design.
3. Ask for help. When you need it, always ask for help
The answer is 'feasting.'
Answer:
The commentary which best responds to this text evidence is:
A) This text evidence shows that storytelling in movies is tighter and smaller in scope than novels.
Explanation:
Let's highlight the part that helps us find the answer:
<em>Movies have always seemed to me a much tighter form of storytelling than novels, requiring greater compression, and in that sense </em><em>falling somewhere between the short story and the novel in scale</em><em>.”</em>
<u>This passage makes it very clear that movies are greater in scale than short stories, but smaller than novels. </u>With this information in mind, we can easily work with elimination to find our option.
<u>Option A says precisely that. It states that storytelling in movies is smaller in scope than novels, which is correct. We have already found the answer, but let's take a look at the other options.</u>
Option B says movies are more like a short story than a novel, which is not what the evidence says. Movies fall between the two genres; it is not more similar to one than the other. Option C says storytelling is similar in both movies and television, but that is completely unrelated to the evidence we are supposed to analyze. Finally, option D states movies are larger in scale than novels, which is the opposite of what the evidence supports.
