Answer:
Based on these definitions I searched, I would go with aspersion since the guy's reputation would fall.
Explanation:
aspersion: an attack on the reputation or integrity of someone or something.
abnegation: the act of renouncing or rejecting something.
approbation: approval or praise.
aberration: a departure from what is normal, usual, or expected, typically one that is unwelcome.
arrogation: to claim or seize without justification
The tone in “Barbara Frietchie” is one of admiration. The speaker clearly admires the stand that Frietchie takes when supporting the Union in front of the Confederate troops. Words such as bravest, loyal, and honor show that the speaker admires Barbara Frietchie’s courage. The poem also has a patriotic tone. This is evident when Frietchie tells the Confederate commander to shoot at her and not at the flag. Frietchie is proud of her beliefs and cannot bear to see the commander disrespect the Union flag. That is the word for word so you will need to change it up a little bit for the teacher not to notice. The tone in barbara Frietchie is admirable. The speaker clearly admires the stand that Frenchie takes when helping the union. Words such as bravery, loyal show that the speaker admires Barbara Frietchie’s courage. The poem also has a patriotic tone. This is evident when Frenchie tells them to shoot at her and not at the flag. Frietchie is proud and will not see them shoot the union flag.
The themes in "Loser" include success, persistence, and conformity while the themes in "at dusk" include perception, deception, and guilt.
Loser is the story of a boy who was branded a loser by his classmates because of his poor performance in school and athletics. He was persistent and was eventually successful.
At Dusk is a poem about deception. It's hard to see people as they truly are at dusk. In about city, everyone is a stranger. The themes include perception, deception, and guilt.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25314274
Answer:
I think your supposed to use your own life experiences :)
Explanation:
Answer:
He could still “hear” in his head. All he had to do was transcribe what he “heard” and knew onto staff paper. Composers do not need to physically hear the music they are writing—they know how it will sound. Basically he already knew the basics of music, and so used his head in place of his ears.
