The two speakers are having an argumentative essay about the case for Mars and <em>whether or not it was important </em>to spend money to send humans to Mars.
<h3>Argumentative Essay</h3>
This refers to the arguments which are made by two or more people about a particular topic.
Usually, there is a claim made by one speaker which is backed up with supporting evidence and then the second speaker can make a rebuttal of the point of the first speaker and give reasons why the first claim is invalid.
We can see that this was used in the two articles; while the first speaker was talking about the need to go to Mars immediately and explore, despite the expense, the second speaker talked about the impracticablilty of the plan.
The second speaker <em>rebutted the claims</em> that humans needed to be there and get evidence of life by stating that robots can be modified to do that and the money can be better used to address problems on earth.
Read more about argumentative essay here:
brainly.com/question/11617771
Answer:
All types of rain are necessary to water the grasses and plants of the earth
Explanation:
the passage is talking about the mood which each kind of rain brings and not the uses of rain.
They enjoyed their time together.
Answer and Explanation:
We are living in the age of digital communication. At all times we see the launch of more technological devices, with more efficient connection networks that allow us to establish communication with anyone anywhere in the world who has access to this type of technology and the best, we can do this without leaving home .
This context seems to establish a perfect reality, where communication is increasingly efficient, but it is not quite so. At least not in the opinion of Sherry Turkle, who believes that in the best place for our communication, technology is destroying it.
In his article "The Flight from Conversation," Turkle states that technology is promoting the loss of the ability to socialize and establish a face-to-face conversation, where it is difficult to hide our real feelings, or "make up" our personality. The expensive conversation the face emits a certain vulnerability that the virtual conversation does not and therefore it is preferable
Turkle uses logical resources to show that disengagement is also an important factor in this situation, because we can be close to people with our goals, but at the same time away, because we don’t need to be close to talking to them, we don’t need to answer communication between them.
Turkle uses clear and direct words, so that anyone can conclude that as technology evolves, communication becomes more artificial and rare, with no real personal connection between individuals.
