Answer:
They felt taxation without representation was unfair.
Explanation:
I found the complete question:
A. Grocers in Arizona and Texas stock a large supply of Mexican products, while grocers in New York stock many kosher products.
B. Beef is extremely cheap in the US, where it is consumed often, but it is extremely expensive in Japan, where it is consumed less.
C. Rice is a common staple in Asia, while potatoes are a common staple in America.
D.
Lobster and caviar are easily affordable in some neighborhoods, while hotdogs and coleslaw are easily affordable in others.
A. Grocers in Arizona and Texas stock a large supply of Mexican products, while grocers in New York stock many kosher products.
Explanation:
Grocers in Arizona and Texas stock a large supply of Mexican products while grocers in New York stock many Kosher products is a perfect situation that illustrates how culture affects supply, demand and consumption. Economic forces of demand, supply and consumption are closely linked to the way of life or culture of people.
- Arizona and Texas are known for their teeming Mexican population.
- It is economic for grocers to store more food products that would attract immigrant population in this region.
- New York has a fair presence of Jews. Kosher products would be good a perfect product to store up in areas like this.
- The above example are perfect examples of cultural influences on the forces of demand, supply and consumption.
Learn more:
demand and supply brainly.com/question/6238369
elastic goods brainly.com/question/2396092
#learnwithBrainly
Earth rotates in and out of a tidal bulge twice a day.
Answer:
Explanation: von Thunen's approach is still relevant today because his approaches still exist in the modern day but with few modifications.
Some of this factors considered are,
Dairying and intensive farming occur in the ring closest to the city: The people in the city mostly consume dairy product. The approach tells that to get good cost balance ratio,dairy farm should be located not too far from city to reduce transportation cost, this approach is still very effective because cost of transporting this produce from a far distance leaves farmers little or no gain. Promixity to end users is important especially when the products are heavier.
2. Crops- He made use of grains as example, grains are often not planted far away from cities because of animals that could feed on it and destroy the field, theft and because of required land mass to cultivate. He stated that grains are light weight and could require low cost of transportation compare to dairy products. This is still important because transporters charged mostly per kg of goods, the weight of grains are lighter reduced the cost of transporting if located in far distance and also it helps reduce risk of loss.
3.Animal-animals can be moved without any means of transporting. Hence, when Ranch is located far from the city where the sales occur the cost of transportation is not a burden.
All this makes von Thunen's still relevant
