1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sonja [21]
3 years ago
9

Petra has done a survey of car ownership in her neighborhood. She finds that the ratio of families who own only one car to those

who own more than one car is 2:3. Which statement below is an accurate explanation of her findings? A For every 3 families in the neighborhood, 2 families own only one car. B For every 5 families in the neighborhood, 2 families own only one car. C For every 3 families in the neighborhood, 2 families own more than one car. D For every 5 families in the neighborhood, 2 families own more than one
History
1 answer:
riadik2000 [5.3K]3 years ago
4 0
The correct answer is
<span>A For every 3 families in the neighborhood, 2 families own only one car

It is stated that the relations are 2:3 in the sense of one car : more cars. That means that for every two families with one car, there are three families with more cars. In that sense, every 4 families will have one car while six families will have more cars, and so on and so forth.</span>
You might be interested in
How did jewish people end up dispersed throughout the earth
Vlada [557]

Answer:

They had rebelled against Roman rule in A.D. 66, a rebellion that took the Romans four years to crush. Thereafter, the Jerusalem temple lay in ruins. and they burned Jerusalem to the ground and it forced the Jewish to spread out.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
During the period between World War I and World War II,
mel-nik [20]

Answer:

The correct answer is the letter b) the U.S. dollar emerged as the dominant world currency, gradually replacing the British pound for the role.

Explanation:

The dollar became a reference throughout the world in the first half of the 20th century, when the gold standard, adopted until then, failed. Until the beginning of the First World War, financial institutions adopted a fixed rate for their currencies in relation to the other. Trade negotiations were carried out respecting this fixed price, preventing some countries from altering their exchange rate to increase their exports and reverse trade deficits, thus guaranteeing the stability of the economy.

With the outbreak of World War I in 1914, the gold standard fell, reflecting the major imbalances it caused in economies around the world. Then, a difficult transition period began. Discussions about the new model started during World War II, and the view that the best strategy would be something similar to that adopted during the gold standard, with a fixed exchange rate, based on a hard currency.

Still in the midst of world conflict, 730 delegates from 44 countries met in July 1944 in Bretton Woods, United States,

to define a new world economic order, which would help to restore world capitalism. The leaders started from two initial proposals, one American, by the US Treasury official Harry White, and one British, by the well-known economist John Keynes.

More comprehensive, according to Colistete, Keynes' proposal was centered on the creation of the International Clearing Union (ICU), which would have the role of generating and regulating credit in order to avoid very large economic fluctuations, as occurred in the interwar period. In addition, a new currency unit, the bank, would be created. White's proposal maintained the link between the exchange rate and gold, but the dollar would be the only currency with a value directly fixed in gold (US $ 35 per ounce of gold). Thereafter, all other countries would have a fixed value for their currency against the US currency.

American ideas ended up prevailing, due to the importance of the United States in the post-war scenario.

5 0
4 years ago
Are there any complanies like.the East India Companies in existance today? how are they different?
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer

British East India Company. It turns out, that India was never originally colonized by the British crown, but by a multinational company (MNC). Robert Clive, who won the Battle Of Palashi (‘Plassey’ for ‘Hey bear, ek gin and tonic idaar!’ folks), was an employee (‘Team Leader’ in 21st-century terms) of the world’s first public limited company. (Britons had equity stakes and to make favorable trading deals, the company ended up having an army.)That hired army ended up ousting the weak-by-then Mughals and accidentally ended up with a nation. Ours. Yes, a large company, so influential and powerful, that it made laws of another nation. The modern equivalent would be if, say, Coca-Cola removed the Chinese premier and started running it. It’s unheard of, mad. But that’s what happened, and that is how I am writing this column in English and you’re reading it in English, both parties pretending as we folks have always been English speakers and writers. All because a bunch of company middle management wanted to protect their investments and threaten some nabobs for their tea and silk and spice and opium trade. And the company’s armies also meted out their version of justice. This begs the question: can a company do that? Today, if you visit the dockland area of London from where the East India Company ships once sailed, hundreds a day to rule Calcutta, Bombay, and Madras, there’s a wildlife reserve, a jogging track, an indoor concert hall called the O2 Arena, a bunch of suburban high-rises that look a bit like Whitefield in Bengaluru, and an HSBC call center. Zero signs that it was once the epicenter of the imperial world, ruling 3/4th of the planet with trade.

3 0
2 years ago
During ww2, the ussr was a communist nation. Communism is
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

Communism is where all money gets evenly distrubited, and everyone is paid by their circumstances.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which statements describe changes that occurred in the United States in the late 1800s? Choose all answers that are correct.
olasank [31]

Answer:

A and B

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Ten simple questions............... thanks
    6·1 answer
  • What does it mean that the colonies were more "democratic " than England ?
    15·1 answer
  • What new country lies south of austria and hungry and north allania
    14·1 answer
  • The term BC/BCE refers to
    15·2 answers
  • The French middle class and peasantry belonged to the ?
    9·1 answer
  • A historian is someone who takes information that is given to them and uses it to write history books. True False
    10·1 answer
  • Why did people come to the New World from England?
    14·1 answer
  • Do you think the southern states were justified in resenting the industrialized urban areas of the North and Northeast? why or w
    12·1 answer
  • The factor that most contributed to the development of Roman civilization was
    8·2 answers
  • HELP...
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!