Answer:
Bias in favor of Jack Kennedy
Explanation:
Jack Kennedy's picture is above Nixon's. On top of that, his right to wrong vote ratio is 120:2 which is incredible. On the other hand, they said Nixon's was 10:59. Thus, portraying the picture that Jack Kennedy is better.
The attack of China meant that there was a huge market and a potential ally cut off from the European powers.
Explanation:
The Chinese market was very lucrative and the nations had believed China would develop into a strong political ally of the nations that are in close ties with it but this was sent in jeopardy when Japan brutally attacked the country and looted its capital.
This ruined the relations between Japan and the western powers and made war an inevitability as the powers could not let go such a brutal attack on one of their staunch allies to go unpunished.
Answer:
A. King George III
Explanation:
the Declaration of independence was created for the king of England for independence and to anounce that they were breaking away from England.
So that means that the Declaration of independence was writtien to King George III
Answer:
Explanation:
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. The case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African American train passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a car for Black people. Rejecting Plessy’s argument that his constitutional rights were violated, the Supreme Court ruled that a law that “implies merely a legal distinction” between white people and Black people was not unconstitutional. As a result, restrictive Jim Crow legislation and separate public accommodations based on race became commonplace. Over the next few years, segregation and Black disenfranchisement picked up pace in the South, and was more than tolerated by the North. Congress defeated a bill that would have given federal protection to elections in 1892, and nullified a number of Reconstruction laws on the books.
Then, on May 18, 1896, the Supreme Court delivered its verdict in Plessy v. Ferguson. In declaring separate-but-equal facilities constitutional on intrastate railroads, the Court ruled that the protections of 14th Amendment applied only to political and civil rights (like voting and jury service), not “social rights” (sitting in the railroad car of your choice).
In its ruling, the Court denied that segregated railroad cars for Black people were necessarily inferior. “We consider the underlying fallacy of [Plessy’s] argument,” Justice Henry Brown wrote, “to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it.”
