Answer: He came up with the short stabbing spear and the long shield
Explanation:
Before Shaka Zulu came to prominence, the tribes in Southern Africa at the time fought with long spears and short shields. Each side would stand apart from the other and throw their long spears to try to kill as many of the other ones as they could.
Shaka Zulu decried this method and came up with a short stabbing spear and a long shield. With the long shield made of cow skin, Zulu warriors would be able to hide from the spears thrown by their enemies and then when they ran out of spears, Zulu warriors would attack them and use shot stabbing spears which were made for close combat, to defeat them.
1st answer is (a) keeping personal files on prominent politicians
2nd answer is (c) Alger Hiss
Answer: 1. Pannasie alienated the overwhelmingly white American critical establishment – key figures were John ... for several of Duke Ellington's later projects, praised the virtues of a tradition-based, swinging mainstream.
One of the originators of big-band jazz, Ellington led his band for more than half a century, composed thousands of ... Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, .
Explanation:
<span>Although most of the settlers were Protestants, Maryland soon became one of the few regions in the British Empire where Catholics held the highest positions of political authority. Maryland was also one of the key destinations of tens of thousands of British convicts. The Maryland Toleration Act of 1649 was one of the first laws that explicitly dictated religious tolerance, though toleration was limited to Trinitarian Christians. </span><span>
</span>
Mapp Vs Ohio issues refer to a judicial case that took place in 1961, in which the Supreme Court ruled 6 to 3 in a case where evidence presented at a trial was illegally obtained and used against the defendant.
Miss Mapp was a woman who refused to admit the intrussion of three Cleveland police officers into her house in persuit to some evidence in connection with a recent bombing issue. Officers did’nt have any warrant signed by a judge when they arrived to her home.
During the case, attorney allegated the protection of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the US (current since 1791 as a part of the Bill of Rights) for the woman. This amendment forbids unreasonable searches and seizures of individuals and property and implies that the use of evidence obtained in violation of the amendment is unconstitutional
