1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Finger [1]
3 years ago
10

Why is it important for historians to create graphs from primary sources?

History
2 answers:
zhannawk [14.2K]3 years ago
5 0

a primary source is a first hand source, it is usually from someone who was there at an event or experienced it

its important that they keep track of these sources, because when things are passed down, words get altered slightly every time they are retold(like the game telephone)

when they keep records of it, it prevents the actual events being messed with


hammer [34]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

It is important for historians to create graphs from primary sources for the purpose of getting the information more clearly and visually so everybody can access the information a can understand it. A primary source is the one that was the product of people who witnessed the event or the incident. It could a testimony, a letter, an interview. So historians could create graphics to better explain the sequence of events, dates, and characters that participated in that part of history.

You might be interested in
Which factor most contributed to the United States becoming a more multicultural society during the late 1700s and the early 180
hoa [83]

Answer:

Explanation:

Immigration were welcomed during late 1700s and early 1800s. Though, federalist fear immigrants can influence the culture and custom of US. This was the time, when United States wanted to keep the number of people in making of United States

7 0
3 years ago
Why did abortion become a central consideration in the appointment of the surpreme court justices?
Grace [21]

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. It was decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton. The Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacyunder the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that this right must be balanced against the state's interests in regulating abortions: protecting women's health and protecting the potentiality of human life.[1] Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the third trimester of pregnancy.

Later, in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), the Court rejected Roe's trimester framework while affirming its central holding that a woman has a right to abortion until fetal viability.[2] The Roe decision defined "viable" as "potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid."[3] Justices in Casey acknowledged that viability may occur at 23 or 24 weeks, or sometimes even earlier, in light of medical advances.[4]

In disallowing many state and federal restrictions on abortion in the United States,[5][6] Roe v. Wade prompted a national debate that continues today about issues including whether, and to what extent, abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role should be of religious and moral views in the political sphere. Roe v. Wade reshaped national politics, dividing much of the United States into pro-abortion and anti-abortion camps, while activating grassroots movements on both sides.

6 0
3 years ago
What is your perspective of feelings about the other Monotheistic Faiths?
Ksenya-84 [330]
I think there is no difference between the God of Muhammed, Jesus and Moses. Their God is thesame although their have different faiths. Their rituals are the only different thing but believing in only one God makes us similar in a way.

That's what I think! :D
5 0
3 years ago
Give two advantages of written sources​
Vilka [71]

Answer:

mark me as brainliest plz

Explanation:

Written sources help in cross-checking data or information collected from oral and other sources of historical knowledge. This help to reach reliable conclusions. Documents provide more detailed information than oral sources, e.g. dates, illustrative pictures, names of participants in events

4 0
3 years ago
A good judge would be all but which of the following
yuradex [85]
Judge and clerk of the court
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Needs for new farm equipment is one way that farming changed in the late 1800s true or false
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following has not been a major change in the workforce within the last century?
    12·2 answers
  • The hessians main goal for winning the war was/
    7·1 answer
  • How did the Kansas-Nebraska Act attempt to resolve the issue of slavery in the territories?
    5·1 answer
  • What was one major effect of the invasion of Poland in 1939?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following people lives a lifestyle most similar to the mongols lifestyle before the rise of genghis khan
    5·2 answers
  • The division of the US government into 3 branches is called
    6·2 answers
  • Drafting the Constitution
    10·1 answer
  • In 1921, a new economic policy called NEP, was adopted under which the government had the right to tax the peasants on a fixed p
    13·1 answer
  • 4. In what ways did the American financial sector and American businessmen
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!