The general consensus amongst historians is that the balance between Federal and State powers was done to appease those who were afraid that too strong of a federal government would be no different than the monarchy that the colonists were overthrowing.
Answer:
In his 'letter from Birmingham jail', King wrote of his Christian duty “to carry the gospel of freedom” across America (King 1963:78). He compared civil rights protestors' acts of civil disobedience to the resistance of biblical dissidents, Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego.
Explanation:
Three fifth of the total population of registered voters
The Federalists argued that they did not need a Bill of Rights because the people and states kept any powers that was not given to the Federal Government. On the other hand, Anti-Federalists said that a Bill of Rights was necessary in order to safeguard individual liberty.
The Bill of Rights is a list of limits on the Government. For example, the founders saw that the first amendment was a natural right and prohibits from making laws establishing religion and abridging (remove or shorten; rights or privileges) freedom of speech.
Hope this Helps! (:
Popular sovereignty is the concept that is best stated by the declaration of independence. <span>That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed (Declaration of Independence preamble) in other words that governments are meant to protect its citizens. </span>
