All categories

3 years ago

3x² + 7x - 5 + 2x² Simplify

Mathematics

1 answer:

Mnenie [13.5K]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

3x^2 + 7x - 5 + 2x^2

= 5x^2 + 7x - 5 (a=5, b=7, c=-5)

x = (-b+/- √(b^2 - 4ac))/2a

= (-7+/- √(49+100))/10

= (-7+√149)/10, (-7-√149)/10

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in

Write a equation of a line perpendicular to the line below in point-slope from that passes through the point (-2,6)

STatiana [176]

Answer:

Option 1: $y-6=-4(x+2)$

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the slope of the perpendicular line by finding the negative reciprocal of the original slope. (Negative reciprocal = flip upside down and add a negative). So we get -4 for the perpendicular slope.

Next, we know the point (-2,6) is on the line, so we can get x=-2 and y=6.

Plug this into point-slope form: $y_{1}-y_{2}=m(x_{1}=x_{2})$

$y_{1} - (6)=-4(x_{1}-(-2))$

$y-6=-4(x+2)$

6 0

3 years ago

When solving inequalities with multiple operations, addition and subtraction are undone before multiplication and division.

nasty-shy [4]

True
In any equation multiplication and division should be done first.

3 0

3 years ago

The scale size is 2cm:4m

MaRussiya [10]

I'm not sure which one is the scale size so i'll solve for both...

Ratio is 2cm:4m
0.02m:4m or 2cm:400cm also work as ratios

400cm/2cm=200 (so the scale is 200X smaller than the original)

Option 1::

If the scale of the item is:

l=12cm and w=6cm

then we can solve for the actual size by multiplying the values by 200

l=12cm*200=2400cm or 24m

w=6cm*200=1200cm or 12m

Option 2::

If the original item has a length of 12m and a width of 6m then:

l=12m and w=6m

We can find the scale length by dividing by 200

l=12m/200=.06m or 6cm

w=6m/200=0.03m or 3cm

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which unit of length would be most appropriate to describe the length of your<br> foot?

ladessa [460]

Answer:

inches

Step-by-step explanation:

well depends on how big your foot is

8 0

4 years ago

A government official is in charge of allocating social programs throughout the city of Vancouver. He will decide where these so

otez555 [7]

Answer: (0.132132, 0.274368)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given : A simple random sample of 123 people living in Gastown and finds that 25 have an annual income that is below the poverty line.

i.e. n= 123

$\hat{p}=\dfrac{25}{123}\approx0.203252$

Critical value for 95% confidence interval : $z_{\alpha/2}=1.96$

Confidence interval for population :

$\hat{p}\pm z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\dfrac{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})}{n}}$

i.e. $0.203252\pm (1.96)\sqrt{\dfrac{0.203252(1-0.203252)}{123}}$

$0.203252\pm (1.96)\sqrt{\dfrac{0.203252(1-0.203252)}{123}}\\\\\0.203252\pm0.071118\\\\=(0.20325-0.071118,\ 0.203252+0.071118)\\\\=(0.132132,\ 0.274368)$

Hence, the 95% confidence interval for the true proportion of Gastown residents living below the poverty line : (0.132132, 0.274368)

5 0

4 years ago