Propaganda posters<span> were disseminated to spread the United States government's </span>goals<span> and messages about </span>World War II<span>.</span>
Answer:
The film is a metaphor for "the rat race." Get it? That's why the rat imagery appears throughout the film. All over the film. The film is a rant against the rat race. The lesson, therefore, is the more obvious "hey, we need to stop and 'smell the roses.'" I found the film enjoyable, and I accepted the recurring scenes as they were intended: without them, you'd have no film. So I simply didn't let the repetition get to me. I looked for inconsistencies in the images as I watched them again and again; that is, I looked for changes during the recurring events. (No, I didn't see any.) But, again, the rat race metaphor is really very clever, and I didn't understand the rat metaphor (assuming I'm correct) until the film started its second cycle. I did not find the "product placements" to be intrusive -- which I'm sure is what the film makers intended.
Explanation:
Answer:
B.farmers charge more foe local food
Explanation:
that's it
C - it’s sorta d but the right answer is c, you simply just use the important information
Answer:
Explanation:
Your best choice is B, opposite of the word hamper. If you suppose someone, you are trying to help them. If you hamper them, you are trying to stop them from doing something.
So A is wrong.
C is also incorrect. If they are opposite in meaning, one of the words will not define the other.
D is nonsense. As an answer it has no meaning. Parts of speech means verbs and nouns and pronouns etc. None of them are supports.
