Ethnic minorities had always have to face many kinds of discrimination in the west, generally because of their racial features and some different aspects in their cultures. Indians, Latin Americans, Asians, Arabians, etc had always been discriminated against and found it difficult to get jobs, be accepted at schools, have friends, have social life and fit in American society. Some ethnic groups suffered more than others. For example, Arabians tend to continue using their typical clothes. As a result, American society regards them as different from the very beginning.
Explanation:
In 1651, Thomas Hobbes famously wrote that life in the state of nature – that is, our natural condition outside the authority of a political state – is ‘solitary, poore, nasty brutish, and short.’ Just over a century later, Jean-Jacques Rousseau countered that human nature is essentially good, and that we could have lived peaceful and happy lives well before the development of anything like the modern state. At first glance, then, Hobbes and Rousseau represent opposing poles in answer to one of the age-old questions of human nature: are we naturally good or evil? In fact, their actual positions are both more complicated and interesting than this stark dichotomy suggests. But why, if at all, should we even think about human nature in these terms, and what can returning to this philosophical debate tell us about how to evaluate the political world we inhabit today?
The question of whether humans are inherently good or evil might seem like a throwback to theological controversies about Original Sin, perhaps one that serious philosophers should leave aside. After all, humans are complex creatures capable of both good and evil. To come down unequivocally on one side of this debate might seem rather naïve, the mark of someone who has failed to grasp the messy reality of the human condition. Maybe so. But what Hobbes and Rousseau saw very clearly is that our judgements about the societies in which we live are greatly shaped by underlying visions of human nature and the political possibilities that these visions entail.
Because the Asian people was defeated a lot of Europeans people.
Answer:
The world benefits from this because it brings new animals and food to different countries. However, it regresses because it also brought diseases to the other countries which can cause death or in other words, is bad for humanity. So the contemporary trade exchanges sometimes help innovations for humanity.
Explanation:
As mentioned above.
Answer:
C. The Caddo lived in dome-shaped huts built from timber
Explanation:
Their Dome-Shaped huts were made from Grass, not Timber.
They supported the dome using long wooden poles as the foundation and covered with dry grass to serve as its Roof and walls. During winter, they often covered the foundation with thick layer of clay to provide protection from the cold weather.
Typically, each of their dome-shaped huts were large enough for 20-30 people to live in. But one hut is usually used by no more than two-three families.
