1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
forsale [732]
3 years ago
9

The judicial branch of the US government has the power to

History
2 answers:
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]3 years ago
7 0
B. interpret laws. apart that it's easy, I also make sure to look it up to make sure
oksian1 [2.3K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The judicial branch of the US government has the power to interpret the Constitution of the United States.

Criminal as well as civil courts belong to the judicial branch and at the same time this judicial branch is a way in which the United States Constitution can be interpreted. The federal government is composed of three branches and the judicial branch is one of them.

We could say that the judicial branch is in charge of the different rules' establishment in a game played between the executive branch as well as the legislative branch. The judicial branch must lookout that the two teams are playing fairly. The judicial branch has the power to do this because it has a unique aspect known as judicial review.

Judicial branch's main organism is the Supreme Court.  

You might be interested in
What do we need to do, as private citizens, to ensure our governmental leadership reflects the diversity of the population?
Ilya [14]

This is the wrong type of thinking

Explanation:

Focusing on diversity of color or diversity of race is not what we should be focusing on but instead diversity of thought. Focusing on race is what racists do. If the population wanted a diverse government they would have voted for one. Just because a particular segment of a group is one race does not mean it's a problem. we have a democracy. As private citezins we should ensure our democracy prevails because whatever the people want is what will be found in Congress or politics.

4 0
3 years ago
Make a project on oil industries of bahrain
Amanda [17]

Explanation:

please mark me as a brainlist...

4 0
3 years ago
Overfishing of salmon has caused populations of wild salmon to decline. To combat this decline, salmon are raised in hatcheries,
Tomtit [17]

The differences in the wild and hatcheries make it so the different salmon adapt differently and have different traits.

If salmon are split up into different habitats, one being in the wild and one being in captivity, they will eventually have different adaptations from each other and their offspring will develop traits that are better suited for their environment.

Wild salmon and salmon that are raised in captivity are going to be very different from each other. The salmon in captivity do not have to actively hunt for their food, be wary of certain predators, or may not want to reproduce.

Taking these factors into account, it is very possible that the salmon raised in captivity will have reduced reproductive success compared to the salmon that thrive in the wild. Along with this, they would most likely have many genetic differences from each other and other traits that better adapt to their living situations.

4 0
3 years ago
Voltaire believed that people by nature were good but that society corrupted them. Please select the best answer from the choice
LiRa [457]

Answer:

Voltaire believed that people by nature were good but that society corrupted them. i hope this helps sorry if it does not!

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the source written by Lopez de Gemara on the Mexican rebellion, what were the attitudes of the Spaniards toward the Mexican?
PolarNik [594]

The attitudes of the Spaniards toward the Aztec rebellion, according to the criteria of Lopez de Gómara were of consternation, and disdain, as he opposed the Mexican rebellion.

<h3>Why Spaniards had these sentiments against Aztecs?</h3>

In his text, Gómara referred to the Indians in Tenochtitlán as a "beast" just because they were very different from the Spaniards.

Native Indians did not wear the clothes Spaniards wore. Indians did not have horses for daily chores.

Gómora said that Aztecs were ignorant people. They had no education and did not have currency, so necessary for economic transactions.

He also said Indians were sinners because they did not believe in the one and only god. Indians worshiped many gods.

He was comparing a different society with the European society of the time. It means that Indians lived a totally different life in contact with and respect for mother nature. Something the Spaniards and Europeans would never understand in North America or South America.

We conclude that López de Gómara opposed the Mexican rebellion and described the Indians with consternation and disdain. Europeans never tried to understand the circumstances of the Native Indians.

Learn more about the Aztec rebellion here:

brainly.com/question/15221853

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Which European leader created a Five-Year Plan, based on Communist ideology, that required workers to double, or triple, product
    6·1 answer
  • Why is the word quarantine used instead of blockade?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did women generally have it harder than men during the long trek west? - Women were generally weaker physically than men. -
    14·2 answers
  • What the romans borrowed from greek polotics?
    15·1 answer
  • List the following events in the order in which they happened.
    6·1 answer
  • Which ideal is not an essential element of the English political tradition?
    10·1 answer
  • 3 fourths of the over 500000 lakes in Europe are found where?
    9·1 answer
  • What contrast can be made between the golden age of cooperation and the Reconquista?
    8·2 answers
  • How does Loki represent hobbesian thought
    13·1 answer
  • 10. Enlightenment thinkers questioned...?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!