I believe it was Great Britain/ England.
Unlike the electoral college system for the president, the procedures for nominating presidential candidates are not spelled out in the constitution. the movement is to encourage people who considered themselves as partisans to participate in their party's presidential selection process was short lived, however.
Civil court is a court case dealing with non-criminal cases unlike criminal court which are court case dealing with criminal law
The correct answer is A) They had differing ideas about a powerful national government.
After the Revolutionary War, states were consistently worried about the power of the national (central) government. Considering that one of the biggest reasons for breaking away from England was a tyrannical central government, helps to understand why there were differing ideas about the structure of the American govenrment when the US became independent.
This is why the United States, under the Articles of Confederation, had a small and weak central government. Some states liked this while other states felt that this central govenrment was too weak to function effectively.
I believe the example is Estaban, who was born into a family with power and is now considered part of the highest group based on his ascribed status
In caste system, the value that individual had within the society is derived from the status/occupation that they had rather than their virtues.
People who born in family with power would most likely able to obtain good occupation/status which made them palced in highest caste group.
