1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Digiron [165]
3 years ago
15

Many colonists chose to side with either the Loyalists or the Patriots. If you were a colonist which side would you chose and wh

y? ( lol I know it's supposed to be my POV but like I need a good reason so just pick one.
History
1 answer:
stich3 [128]3 years ago
4 0
I would choose the Patriots, as they stood for more freedoms , like freedom of speech and freedom of religion.
You might be interested in
Which group gained the most as a result of the Latin American revolutions?
rewona [7]

Answer:

The Patriots were the obvious winners in the Revolution; they gained independence, the right to practice representative government, and several new civil liberties and freedoms. Loyalists, or Tories, were the losers of the Revolution; they supported the Crown, and the Crown was defeated.

3 0
3 years ago
American History Section 11 BC / Module 12: 1989-Present (Days 166-180)
o-na [289]

Answer:

A, The ongoing conflict in Iraq caused both candidates to turn away from President Bush.

Explanation:

President Bush's war in Iraq wasn't popular when the election of 2008 was coming up. Many people were disapproving of President Bush. While McCain wanted to see the war come to a victory, he still distanced himself from President Bush.

7 0
2 years ago
Who finances the EPA's superfund
n200080 [17]
A congressional agency formed under President Theodore Roosevelt. 

I hope this helps!

Have a nice day!

:) 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two entrepreneurs believed they were examples of social Darwinism at work? A.Thomas Edison and George Westinghouse B.Andre
mars1129 [50]

Answer:

B) Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller

Explanation:

The term <em>social Darwinism</em> refers to a group of theories that began appearing in the 1870s in Western Europe, the United Kingdom, and North America. According to these theories, the concepts of survival of the fittest and natural selection didn't have to apply only to the world of biology, but sociology and politics as well. Social Darwinists, like Andrew Carnegie, the leader of expansion of American steel industry and one of the richest Americans to have ever lived, and John D. Rockefeller, also an industrialist, who is considered to be the richest person in modern history, believed that certain people could become powerful in society because they are inherently better than others.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can anyone help me with this question??? ITS URGENT PLS HELP ME 20 PTS
Ede4ka [16]


He had a well-shaped head - not the "bullet" type of many pugilists - and dark hair which was turning gray. He carried this head at a proud angle which gave emphasis to his prominent jaw. His face was somewhat florid, so that even without knowing who he was, on would have said "Here is a man who has been a hard drinker." He had a fine mustache in the old tradition. Starting below his nostrils this mustache, a few shades grayer than his hair, extended in leisurely fashion over his lip and all the way across his face on both sides. The under edges were a trifle ragged and the curl at the ends was upward. He had a custom of snorting sometimes, as he was about to say something, after which he would stroke his mustache, first on one side, then on the other. I got the idea that this stroking business acted as a sedative on him. . . .

He talked with a perceptible, but not pronounced, brogue. When he became excited, however, this brogue grow thicker. He made small errors in grammar, which stamped him as a man of little education, but remembering how brief his education really was, one had to admit that he talked remarkably well. . . .

"Well, there's nothing to fighting, " he opened up, "Just come out fast from your corner, hit the other fellow as hard as you can and hit him first. That's all there is to fighting."

He laughed, then at once grew serious.

"What I should like to talk about is something else. Whiskey! There's the only fighter that ever really licked old John L. Jim Corbett, according to the record, knocked me out in New Orleans in 1892, but he only gave the finishing touches to what whiskey had already done to me. If I had met Jim Corbett before whiskey got me I'd have killed him. I stopped drinking long ago, but of course, too late. Too late for old John L., but not too late for millions of boys who are starting out to follow the same road

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Martin Van Buren exercise two official and unofficial roles during his administration? Just a short answer will do, than
    7·1 answer
  • Why was China so late to industrialize
    5·1 answer
  • What was Alexander Hamilton's belief about government?
    14·2 answers
  • When was abraham lincoln born
    13·2 answers
  • What were the results of Spanish and Portuguese conquests in the americas
    11·1 answer
  • Which policy of General Weyler of Spain was intended to destroy the Cuban rebellion?
    13·1 answer
  • In the late 1800s and early 1900s, several Chinatowns had violent riots that were started by
    9·2 answers
  • Need help with questions 2 and 3 !!
    6·1 answer
  • The first settlers in North America were from which area of the world?
    10·1 answer
  • What is an example of feminism that is inclusive of multiple groups?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!