1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lesantik [10]
3 years ago
6

During the french and Indian war France and Great Britain fought for control of north America territory what impact did the end

of the war have on American colonies
Geography
1 answer:
artcher [175]3 years ago
5 0

In the short-term, The French-Indian War or The Seven Years War expanded the British colonial territory in North America by an enormous amount and removed potential competitors in early westward expansion. In the long-term, it resulted in extreme national debt in Britain, bringing about dictatorial control of its colonies so it could alleviate economic stress. First came the passing of the Proclamation of 1763, which stopped all westward movement by its American colonies past the Appalachian Mountains (they hoped to make Native Americans and the Spanish buy land), then several new Acts like the Stamp Act were passed which taxed goods like paper, and eventually, as some historians interpret, led to the American Revolution.

You might be interested in
What factors influence a region's photosynthetic productivity ?
tangare [24]
<span>Photosynthesis is the process through which living organisms convert environmental carbon dioxide and water into glucose. The glucose is a sugar essential element that fuels life processes.</span><span>
Region's photosynthetic productivity is influenced by the the availability of nutrients and the amount of solar radiation, or sunlight.
</span><span>Nutrients as iron, magnesium and sulfur decrease photosynthesis rates., while nitrogen and phosphorus can prevent a plant from metabolizing glucose.</span>
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do the Mississippi and Amazon rivers differ? A) The Mississippi has always been more of a major highway.
inessss [21]

The Mississippi and the Amazon are quite different in that <u>C) the </u><u>Amazon </u><u>is much </u><u>longer </u><u>than the </u><u>Mississippi</u><u>.</u>

The Amazon River:

  • Is the second longest river in the world.
  • Is longer than the Mississippi.

The Amazon river is measured to be a distance of 3,969 miles whilst the Mississippi is around 3,896 miles which means that the Amazon is longer than the Mississippi.

In conclusion, option C is correct.

<em>Find out more about the</em><em> Amazon River </em><em>at brainly.com/question/2526784. </em>

7 0
2 years ago
Stop 1. The oldest rocks on this VFE are from the Conococheague Fm from the Cambrian period of geologic time. The Conococheague
VMariaS [17]

"The oldest rocks on this VFE are from the Conococheague Fm from the Cambrian period of geologic time. The Conococheague " These are both indicators of Tropical Climate and Shallow Marine. This is further explained below.

<h3>What is Tropical Climate?</h3>

Generally, The coldest month's average temperature must be at least 18 degrees Celsius (64.4 degrees Fahrenheit) for a climate to be classified as tropical, and hot temperatures prevail throughout the year.

In conclusion, "The Conococheague Fm of the Cambrian era has the oldest rocks on this VFE. The Conococheague Tribe of Indians "Climate and shallow marine environments are both indicative of a tropical climate

Read more about  Tropical Climate

brainly.com/question/885982?

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
Explain how looking at the magnetism of certain rocks helps support the idea that the continents have moved and changed over tim
enyata [817]

Twenty years ago geologists were certain that the data correlated perfectly with the then-reigning model of stationary continents. The handful of geologists who promoted the notion of continental drift were accused of indulging in pseudoscientific fancy. Today, the opinion is reversed. The theory of moving continents is now the ruling paradigm and those who question it are often referred to as stubborn or ignorant. This "revolution" in our concept of the earth's character is a striking commentary on the human nature of scientists and on the flexibility that scientists allow in use of the geological data.

Plate Tectonics

The popular theory of drifting continents and oceans is called "plate tectonics."1 (Tectonics is the field of geology which studies the processes which deform the earth’s crust.) The general tenets of the popular theory may be stated as follows. The outer lithospheric shell of the earth consists of a mosaic of rigid plates, each in motion relative to adjacent plates. Deformation occurs at the margins of plates by three basic types of motion: horizontal extension, horizontal slipping, and horizontal compression. Sea-floor spreading occurs where two plates are diverging horizontally (e.g., the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and East Pacific Rise) with new material from the earth's mantle being added between them to form a new oceanic crust. Transform faulting occurs where one plate is slipping horizontally past another (e.g., the San Andreas fault of California and the Anatolian fault of northern Turkey). Subduction occurs where two plates are converging with one plate underthrusting the other producing what is supposed to be compressional deformation (e.g., the Peru-Chile Trench and associated Andes Mountains of South America). In conformity with evolutionary-uniformitarian assumption, popular plate tectonic theory supposes that plates move very slowly — about 2 to 18 centimeters per year. At this rate it would take 100 million years to form an ocean basin or mountain range.

Fitting of Continents

The idea that the continents can be fitted together like a jigsaw puzzle to form a single super continent is an old one. Especially interesting is how the eastern "bulge" of South America can fit into the southwestern "concavity" of Africa. Recent investigators have used computers to fit the continents. The "Bullard fit"2 gives one of the best reconstructions of how Africa, South America, Europe, and North America may have once touched. There are, however, areas of overlap of continents and one large area which must be omitted from consideration (Central America). There are a number of ways to fit Africa, India, Australia, and Antarctica (only one can be correct!). Reconstructions have been shown to be geometrically feasible which are preposterous to continental drift (e.g., rotation of eastern Australia fits nicely into eastern North America).3

Those who appreciate the overall fit of continents call the evidence "compelling," while others who note gaps, overlaps, or emissions remain skeptical. It is difficult to place probability on the accuracy of reconstructions and one's final judgment is largely subjective.

Sea-Floor Spreading

Evidence suggesting sea-floor spreading is claimed by many geologists to be the most compelling argument for plate tectonics. In the ocean basins along mid-ocean ridges or rises (and in some shallow seas) plates are thought to be diverging slowly and continuously at a rate of several centimeters yearly. Molten material from the earth's mantle is injected continuously between the plates and cools to form new crust. The youngest crust is claimed to be at the crest of the ocean rise or ridge with older crust farther from the crest. At the time of cooling, the rock acquires magnetism from the earth's magnetic field. Since the magnetic field of earth is supposed by many geologists to have reversed numerous times, during some epochs cooling oceanic crust should be reversely magnetized. If sea-floor spreading is continuous, the ocean floor should possess a magnetic "tape recording" of reversals. A "zebra stripe" pattern of linear magnetic anomalies parallel to the ocean ridge crest has been noted in some areas and potassium-argon dating has been alleged to show older rocks farther from the ridge crest.

There are some major problems with this classic and "most persuasive" evidence of sea-floor spreading. First the magnetic bands may not form by reversals of the earth's magnetic field. Asymmetry of magnetic stripes, not symmetry, is the normal occurrence.4 It has been argued that the linear patterns can be caused by several complex interacting factors (differences in magnetic susceptibility, magnetic reversals, oriented tectonic stresses).5

<span>
</span>
7 0
3 years ago
In what way way Reagan able to influence national decades after he was nice longer a president
Harrizon [31]
<span>His appointment of three Supreme Court justices</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Look at the project and population pyramid 20 years in the future by selecting the year 2035 from the drop-down menu what change
    9·2 answers
  • What factors led to World war || ?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following types of models is most likely to be used to predict earthquakes?. a.. idea model. b.. physical model. c.
    14·2 answers
  • The weather behind a cold front is dominated by _____.
    15·2 answers
  • Boreal forests tend to have a thick layer of organic material but the soil is poor in nutrients. What is the best explanation fo
    8·1 answer
  • What form must the nitrogen be in?
    9·1 answer
  • What rocks forms when limestone undergoes metamorphism?
    15·1 answer
  • Explain how the geography of eastern europe has influenced the spread of culture and politics
    11·1 answer
  • Parafrasea la información del texto escogido (texto1 o texto2), es decir, usa tus propias palabras y realiza dos realice dos pár
    5·1 answer
  • Too what extent has urban change created opportunities in a uk city that you have studied
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!