Answer:
(1857) Dred Scott v. Sandford
Explanation: In the opinion of the court, the legislation and histories of the times, and the language used in the Declaration of Independence, show, that neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves, nor their descendants, whether they had become free or not, were then acknowledged as a part of the people, nor
I hope this answers your question! :D
The correct answer is A) Slavery would be abolished in Washington DC.
The Compromise of 1850 was a critical law, as it helped to prevent the Civil War from starting in the 1850's. Due to America's expansion into the west and the newly gained territory after the Mexican American War, Northern and Southern politicians were arguing constantly over whether or not slavery will exist in these new territories.
To make both sides satisfied, Henry Clay helped to develop the Compromise of 1850.This included California becoming a free state, New Mexico and Utah using popular sovereignty to determine whether or not slavery would exist, and the slave trade would be outlawed in Washington DC. However, this law said nothing about the actual institution of slavery in DC.
George clinton do not in favor of strong executive branch while benjamin franklin did. George clinton is a part of an anti-federalist group who believed that a country should give most of its power to its people, not its government. He believed that Strong executive branch will deteriorate people's core freedom to take care of themselves.
Indicates the basic ancient Roman Army unit, recruited specifically from Roman citizens. The "legion" means entire army.
