The answer is D. In Harvard's "Tastes, Ties and Time" stsudy, the primary ethical violation was the failure to protect research subjects from deductive disclosure.
This study consisted of the gathering and releasing of data from the social network account of an entire class of college students, through a three year period. The ethical violations of the study have been discussed because, although researchers inteded to protect the identity of the students by removing their names and other private information from the data, the identity of the school which was also to remain anonymous was quickly figured out, and in consequence, subjects were also identified.
In this case, deductive disclosure was an ethical violation because, even though the identity of the subjects was not revealed, it was possible to identify them.
Answer:
The keynote address
Explanation:
In 2004, the Ex-US president, Barak Obama delivered the keynote speech at the National Convention. The speech sets the main theme of the convention straight and this keynote address aided his chance of becoming the US president in 2004.
Barak Obama was one of the several people considered to deliver keynote addresses at the National Convention. Obama's keynote address included his autobiography, his vision for the United State of America and how racism can be dealt with among the citizens and residents of the United States and his reasons for supporting John Kerry for the presidency.
He talked about how his grandparents who were from Kenyan survived particularly his paternal grandfather who worked as a domestic servant for the British colonial masters and how his father migrated to the United State through a scholarship to study in the United States. His maternal grandfather fought under Patton in World War II. He addressed the issue of how the course of living in the United States would be improved especially in the course of job, education, healthcare. Many writers and academics have studied the speech and evaluate it since its delivery. At the end of his address, he talked about the audacity of hope of citizens and residents including the immigrants living under average.
Answer:
The study of history can help us make decisions about the future because:
D) historical instances of conflict and cooperation are examples that we can learn from.
Explanation:
Let's analyze each option separately to find the best answer.
Option A says events do not change. The same things that happened in past will happen again now and in the future. That is a dangerous affirmation. Some events could be similar, but never exactly the same. The context and the people involved, for instance, are different. Therefore, option A can be eliminated. And since option B makes a similar claim, we can also eliminate it.
Option C states people who study history are smart and make better decisions. This is quite biased, as a matter of fact. People who study other subjects and specialize in other fields are also smart and also make good decisions. Thus, this is not a good reason to justify why the study of history can help us.
<u>Option D is the correct one. Indeed, by looking back and learning from not only conflicts but also cooperation, we can make more informed decisions for the future. The situations will not be exactly the same, for that is impossible, but we can avoid certain mistakes and move more carefully by keeping in mind what worked and what did not work in the past.</u>
The answer is.... voluntary
The Blue Nile and White Nile meet in <span>Khartoum, Sudan to form the Nile River.
Hope this helps :)</span>
