All categories

3 years ago

Why was friedrich von hayek against government intervention in an economy?

Business

2 answers:

BaLLatris [955]3 years ago

8 0

I believe the answer is: D. It would improve the economy's situation

friedrich von hayek believe that government intervention would only benefit some part of the organizations in a private sectors while reducing the power of the other organization, which tilt the balance of power in the market.

When this happen, people would be discouraged to be involved in opening up new businesses, which would stunt our economic growth.

shepuryov [24]3 years ago

5 0

The answer top the question stated above is letter D. It would improve the economy's situation.

For F<span>riedrich Von </span>Hayek, less government intervention<span> meant more </span>economic freedom. He believed that if people are free to choose, then the economy runs more efficiently.
Thus, it would improve the economy's situation.

You might be interested in

How do you spell proportional

Flura [38]

no offense but you kinda just spelled it

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Lang Warehouses borrowed $178,960 from a bank and signed a note requiring 8 annual payments of $28,819 beginning one year from t

yan [13]

Answer: 6%

Explanation:

The annual payments can be considered to be annuity payments as they are constant. The amount borrowed can be considered the present value of the annuity.

Present value of annuity = Annuity * Present value interest factor of annuity, 8 years, %?

178,960 = 28,819 * Annuity factor

Annuity factor = 178,960 / 28,819

= 6.20979

To find out the interest rate, look at the Present Value of Annuity table and go to the 8 period column. Look for 6.20979. The interest rate that intersects with this factor is the interest rate implicit in this agreement.

That rate is 6%.

4 0

2 years ago

postal express is considering the purchase of a new sorting machine. the sales quote consists of quarterly payments of $37,200 f

Cloud [144]

The five-year sales quote includes quarterly payments of $37,200 at a 7.6% interest rate. The price of the acquisition is $614,184.40.

<h3>Do you mean by PMT payment?</h3>

PMT stands for "payment," therefore the name of the function. A PMT method can estimate your monthly payments, for instance, if you are looking for a $30,000 car loan with a two-year term and an annual interest rate of 7%.

<h3>In the fv formula, what is PMT?</h3>

PV = present value, and FV=PMT(1+i)((1+i)N - 1)/i Future Value (FV) Payment per period (PMT) I = percent per period interest rate N is the number of cycles.

Quarterly Payment = PMT = $37,400

Interest Rates = r = 7.6% per year = 0.076 per year = 0.076 / 4 = 0.019 per quarter

Number of years = 5 years

Number of Payment = n = 5 years x 4 quarters per year = 20 quarters

PV = PMT x (1 - [1 / (1 +r)^n]) / r

PV = $37,200 x (1 - [1 / (1 +0.019)^20]) / 0.019

PV = $614,184.40

Learn more about PMT: brainly.com/question/12890163

#SPJ1

5 0

1 year ago

Jamie can't help but notice and be negatively affected by the interviewer's frown as he explains to her why he left his last job

stepan [7]

12345678901234567890

5 0

3 years ago

Why has the use of polling increased greatly in america? what are the negative aspects, if any?

Lostsunrise [7]

The utilization of Polling has expanded because of innovation which makes it less expensive and more broadly utilized. policy makers also uses the polling to stay in contact with changing sentiments on the issues. Polling can have negative aspect in light of the fact that it makes the politicians more worried about getting the vote as opposed to taking the ethical stand.

5 0

3 years ago