It's two of them, They were dependant on the USSR and They were neighboring states.
If you have to pick one, it's the first one I said.
Answer:
It ruled against Dred Scott and set aside the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty.
Explanation:
The case Dred Scott v. Sanford argued whether a slave can obtain his freedom when he step on a state that make slavery illegal.
It happened in 1857. At that time, Dred Scott's (A slave) was taken by his owner from Missouri to Illinois. (According to Missouri compromise, It is still legal to own slaves in Missouri but It is Illegal to do so in Illinois).
Scott tried to make his case to the court stating that as soon as he entered Illinois, his status as a slave should be voided and he should be considered as a citizen.
At that time, The Missouri supreme court ruled against Scott's plead. The court stated that he could never be a citizen since citizenship only apply to white people. So he's still a slave no matter where his slave owner took him.
Answer:
B the large influence revivals had on Americans
Explanation:
HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEGEGGDG NOOOOO
Answer:
By contesting the laws of his country, to obey a higher law and his own moral conscience, while also fighting for equalities.
Explanation:
In Mohammed Ali's prime, while he was the undefeated heavyweight champion in boxing, he refused to be drafted into Army for Vietnam war in 1967, with the opportunity of multiplying his wealth by accepting an army job, instead, Mohammed Ali keeps advocating for civil rights, and to the extent that he risked everything he had laboured, trained and toiled for, at the peak of his boxing career, to defend the principles he believed in.
He also championed for the cause of black separatism and resistance to white dominance.
