???? Do u even want an answer or nah
sending out his people to war and wining it in 90 days
In North America in the parts north of the present day Mexico, the First Nations had climatically a more hostile environment to deal with than their counterparts in the now Mexico and Mesoamerica and South America. The winters on the Great Plains and in the now Canadian north were harsh and did not favor large populations to develop (with some exceptions like in British Columbia, Canada which had a mild climate and in which 100's of 1000's of First Nations lived). So the mainly plains Indians had a nomadic existence following the game and fish and so had a more egalitarian less centralized leadership than their counterparts to the south. In Mexico, Mesoamerica and South America, the climate was generally less harsh, and fairly large scale agriculture was practiced and the people were more sedentary and political power was held in the hands of rulers who though they had henchmen, tended to be all-powerful, though the Incas for example had a quite equitable system of compulsory labour for public works and mines, allowing time for the participants to work their own fields to sustain their families.
The development around the world is measured by using several different methods. Mostly these methods include the GDP, GDP per capita, industrialization, freedom of speech, level of corruption, type of economy, availability of institutions to the people, healthcare, availability of resources etc. All of these things combined are able to provide us with a fairly accurate picture on the level of development of a particular country. Some countries are well developed, some are transitioning, while some are with very low level of development. The countries that are well developed often put effort to help the countries that are not developed, and they do this by providing finances for capital projects, making trading deals with them, sending experts in certain fields to help with the development and education.
