a. <em>Endure injustice with patience </em>This is the correct option.
Helen is a staunch Christian. She thinks that one should turn the other cheek to hardship. Helen strongly believes in her faith, which makes her be patient and tolerant.
d. <em>The abuse of power is wrong</em>.<em> </em>This is the correct option.
Charlotte Brontë is against the nineteenth-century Evangelical movement. She reflects this through the religious characters. Mr. Brocklehurst is a hypocrite since his family lives at the expense of the students from Lowood and he is also abusive with the students. He punishes students at school severly. Then, St. John Rivers does not respect Jane's real feelings. He obliges her to marry him just to fulfill his personal religious ambitions. These characters exercise power over the other characters.
These options are not right:
b. Fight injustice with truth. ( Helen has a religious not a rational idea of truth).
c. Answer injustice with violence ( Helen bears violence herself)
d. Eliminate injustice with reform. ( Helen dies and has not started any reform).
a. The passage of time heals all wounds.( Through Jane, who wants to strike a balance between religious thoughts and earthly pleasures, Brontë believes that wounds are part of real life).
b. The tenderness of youth is forgotten in later years. ( Brontë's focus is on criticising the Evangelical movement. She is not interested in the loss of youth's tenderness).
c. The importance of friendship cannot be underestimated. ( There is an idea that goes beyond friendship: what religion does to a person's way of life).
I’m here to collect them points ayee but no im not familiar with her
Answer:
Metaphor
Explanation:
It's metaphor, because it is comparing his heart to being frozen. Not to be mistaken for simile which compares two things using like/as. Hope this helps!<3
Answer:
dialogues and descriptions
In a working fiction, best place to look for supporting details that indicate the theme of fiction is in dialogues and descriptions. A dialogue is a literary technique in which writers use two or more characters participating in conversation with one another.
