Answer:
general partnership
Explanation:
General partnership -
It refers to the management of a particular business , by two or more partners in a predefined manner , where the profit is shares equally amongst the partners , is referred to as general partnership .
The decision about the business is taken along with all the partners ,like the financial decisions.
Any loss or profit is shares equally amongst all .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
Sandra and Clara enters into a general partnership .
Answer:
$607,250 outflow
Explanation:
Net Working Capital is the amount of money needed to maintain operations on a day to day basis.
Net Working Capital = Current Assets - Current Liabilities
where,
<u>Current Assets are calculated as :</u>
Inventory $216,000
Accounts Receivable ($525,000 x 1.09) $575,250
Total $788,250
and
Current Liabilities = $181,000
therefore,
Net Working Capital = $788,250 - $181,000 = $607,250
Conclusion
The project's initial cash flow for net working capital is $607,250 outflow.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
Organizational expense amortized over fifteen years for purposes of determining taxable income results in an upper adjustment in the initial years to book income on the Schedule Minus−1 when the expense is being amortized over ten years for book income purposes.
Answer: Admin trade policy
Explanation: Administrative trade policies are governmental guidelines that are programmed almost always intentionally to limit the distribution of a particular import into a nation.Anti-dumping programs are designed to condemn dumping foreign firms. If a company is found to be dumping, government imposes countervailing duties.
In the given case, Govt. too imposes heavy scrutiny policy on imports that are supposed to demotivate the exporters from other countries. Hence from the above we can conclude that the given case depicts admin trade policy.
Answer: An unrestricted component of net position
Explanation:
Fund balances can be committed, restricted, assigned, and unassigned. The designation of city council has no right to restrict funds.
A restriction of fund can only be imposed through legislation, constitution, or external resource providers, and not by the designation by the city council. In this case, funds would be unrestricted.
