1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Likurg_2 [28]
3 years ago
9

This passage describes the early years of the Columbian Exchange. Based on this passage, why did many indigenous inhabitants of

the New World adopt the view that interaction with European settlers was harmful to their societies?
Just twenty years ago, the lands were filled with peoples from different nations, each with their own customs and tongues. Not a day went by without the assurance there would be plentiful land and an abundance of beasts in the forests for their peoples. Their villages and settlements were many, and their societies were rich and complex. Warriors, craftsmen, weavers, hunters, and dealers engaged in their everyday lives, bringing much good to their nations. But then the merchants from across the Great Sea started to come, and they brought with them a great many things never seen before on these shores. The inhabitants were glad at first to trade for these items they desired so greatly. But these brought only temporary benefits. For hidden in these goods was an invisible force, one that would affect every tribe in this great land. No person, regardless of stature, was spared. Children, mothers, and even chiefs were no match for this unseen warrior. In the span of only three generations, the majority of their villages disappeared, and the greatest lot of their peoples walked this land no more.
A. The inhabitants of the New World were pressured to join military alliances with the European settlers.
B. The European settlers used military force to compel the inhabitants of the New World to trade.
C. The European settlers were hoarding goods produced by the New World inhabitants.
D. The inhabitants of the New World had no
resistance to new diseases brought by the Europeans.
History
2 answers:
DIA [1.3K]3 years ago
6 0
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that:  "C. The European settlers were hoarding goods produced by the New World inhabitants." This is the reason why many indigenous inhabitants of the New World adopt the <span>view that interaction with European settlers was harmful to their societies</span>
Volgvan3 years ago
6 0

The inhabitants of the New World had no resistance to new diseases brought by the Europeans. (APEX)

You might be interested in
Which statement explains how the sharecropping system kept emancipated slaves tied to the plantation land they had worked before
Stolb23 [73]

Answer:

2) Most African American sharecroppers ended each year owing money to the landlord, thus preventing them from leaving the land.

7 0
2 years ago
During the years the articles of confederation were in force this excerpt from the textbook explain why
GuDViN [60]
<span>The Articles of Confederation were written documentation that laid out the purpose of the new national government of the US once it was independent from Great Britain an in control of itself. In essence, these articles were the Constitution prior to it's existence.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
__________ is defined as the art of conducting relations with other countries, including negotiating alliances, treaties, and tr
Evgesh-ka [11]
Diplomacy is defined as the art of conducting relations with other countries, including negotiating alliances, treaties and trade agreements. The largest diplomatic organization in the world are the United Nations with it's headquarters in New York City. Diplomacy usually is referenced to international relations.
5 0
2 years ago
During the Revolutionary War, all of the Iroquois sided with the British and fought with them against the Americans.
irakobra [83]
A) True
They were angry at colonists for taking their land. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1.) In exchange for allowing him to live, what did Sulla take away from Caesar?
nekit [7.7K]

Answer:

Well, this is going to be a long answer! I hope I helped, please correct me if I'm wrong!

1. I believe he took Caesar's wife and Cinna’s daughter, in exchange of his life, since research showed that Young Julius Caesar was proscribed for no reason other than he refused to divorce his wife. (I'm not very sure about this)

2. He never married her because Rome, after all, did not recognize plural marriage, and at that time, Caesar was still married to Calpurnia.

3.  Caesar focused on economic changes, like improved land and waterways. His political reforms focused on creating physical structures, rebuilding cities and temples, and improving the Senate, The main ruling body in Rome. (I'm sorry about this one, I'm not very sure which one was most important)

4. The senators assassinated Caesar because they feared his unprecedented concentration of power during his dictatorship was undermining the Roman Republic, and presented the deed as an act of tyrannicide.

5. The death of Julius Caesar ultimately had the opposite impact of what his assassins hoped. Much of the Roman public hated the senators for the assassination, and a series of civil wars ensued.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Disequilibrium occurs when
    9·1 answer
  • Recalling what happened in the XYZ affair
    13·1 answer
  • What was a power given by the Articles of Confederation?
    15·2 answers
  • How did Buddhism branch from Hinduism?
    12·2 answers
  • How did the balance of power in Europe shift as a result of World War One
    10·1 answer
  • Which would a historian use most often to research people or events from the past?
    8·1 answer
  • Is the church powerful?
    12·1 answer
  • Use the image to answer the following question: The image shows map of the Erie Canal. © Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. / Image
    7·1 answer
  • 16. To which of the following did the Protestant Reformation signify a response?
    12·1 answer
  • In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!