Answer:
During World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union fought together as allies against the Axis powers. However, the relationship between the two nations was a tense one. Americans had long been wary of Soviet communism and concerned about Russian leader Joseph Stalin’s tyrannical rule of his own country. For their part, the Soviets resented the Americans’ decades-long refusal to treat the USSR as a legitimate part of the international community as well as their delayed entry into World War II, which resulted in the deaths of tens of millions of Russians. After the war ended, these grievances ripened into an overwhelming sense of mutual distrust and enmity.
Postwar Soviet expansionism in Eastern Europe fueled many Americans’ fears of a Russian plan to control the world. Meanwhile, the USSR came to resent what they perceived as American officials’ bellicose rhetoric, arms buildup and interventionist approach to international relations. In such a hostile atmosphere, no single party was entirely to blame for the Cold War; in fact, some historians believe it was inevitable.
The Cold War: Containment
By the time World War II ended, most American officials agreed that the best defense against the Soviet threat was a strategy called “containment.” In his famous “Long Telegram,” the diplomat George Kennan (1904-2005) explained the policy: The Soviet Union, he wrote, was “a political force committed fanatically to the belief that with the U.S. there can be no permanent modus vivendi [agreement between parties that disagree].” As a result, America’s only choice was the “long-term, patient but firm and vigilant containment of Russian expansive tendencies.” “It must be the policy of the United States,” he declared before Congress in 1947, “to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation…by outside pressures.” This way of thinking would shape American foreign policy for the next four decades.
Explanation:
hope this helped
1. Success of the Appeasement Police.
Neville Chamberlain used this motto ("Peace in our time") during the Munich Agreement when Czechoslovakia had to give over the Sudetenland over to Germany.
Answer:
Option A
Changes in thinking lead to innovative problem-solving.
Explanation:
First of all, we need to understand what synthesis is, and how we can apply it to various thought processes and reasoning.
Synthesis when applied to human reasoning, can be seen as the cognitive ability to put separate items or pieces of information together, to form a new idea.
Applying synthesis to thinking will make it easier to create new solutions to problems. This is because several resources and methods can be combined in various flexible manners to give birth to novel solutions that were non-existent as at when the resources and methods were seen as distinct entities.
English :) hope this helped<span />
