Hello there.
<span>In the Dred Scott case, the Supreme Court decided
</span><span>D. the Missouri Compromise was illegal because it was illegal for Congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without
the due process of law.</span>
B
"The argument also assumes that social prejudice can also be overcome by legislation"
the laws assume that you are able to overcome social prejudice without the constitution determining it; you do it by legislation.
i hope this helped you a bit!
Well, from among the choices given your answer is going to be B. This is because the British had been taxing people and taking tea and selling it. So everyone threw it overboard as a sign of rebellion.
I hope this helps!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest
Mainly it is due to a piece of dirt, and a territorial dispute. India and Pakistan freed themselves from Britain in 1947, and the Indian Independence Act gave Kashmir the opportunity to freely choose which ever country they wanted to accede or join with, whether it be India or Pakistan. The leader of Kashmir chose India, resulting in a two-year war and also resulting in both countries being nuclear armed. It is pure ego and a fight for money and power.
The necessary and proper clause is also known as the elastic clause