Suspense
You can see this by the the setting of the excerpt.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Insurances are basically Ponzi schemes as we, as the insured, pay the insurance company our premiums in return for insurance against some sort of event. But to get back to the point yes you should compare prices of other companies, as well as the actual service, coverage, and premium they have as at the end of the day they are a corporation and their goal is to use you and your money because insurance is a Ponzi scheme but one that we all use and help those who don't have the money to cover for emergencies and disaster, not to mention it is required to drive your car legally.
Answer:
A. it affected the lives of every american
Explanation:
because in this at the start it stated (was the day that affected the lives of all americans)
Hope This Helped
Answer:
Interactionist theory
Explanation:
Interactionism is a hypothetical point of view that infers social procedures, (for example, struggle, participation, personality development) from human cooperation. It is the investigation of how people shape society and are molded by society through implying that emerges in connections.
Interactionism, otherwise called emblematic connection, is one of the primary points of view in humanism. Interactionism utilizes a miniaturized scale level methodology, concentrating on social connection in explicit circumstances.
Answer:
Answer is Option B: that she was under undo duress from her son and daughter-in-law and that the agreement is voidable.
Explanation:
When the broker came to offer Mrs. G, the price he offered was quite less than what she was asking for. Still his son and his wife urged her to sign the offer. So, later she can claim that she was under a lot of threat and violence from her son and daughter-in-law to sign the offer and it would make the agreement voidable.
She cannot claim about Broker's offering less price, as per Option A. Neither she can say that Broker defrauded them, as per Option C. Option D is also incorrect as it says that her consumer rights were taken illegally by her son and his wife.
