Answer:
I don't think the paragraph catches attention.
Explanation:
The paragraph appears to be a persuasive text, and to make your text successful in changing others' mindsets, it needs to be appealing enough for the readers to go through all the way. It does follow TBEAR elements, but it is too dull to change anything. To make it worthy of readers' attention, you have to keep evidence short. Ignore the parts of the evidence that is not necessary.
<em>If I got it wrong, I will return the points to you through another question. Have a good day! :)</em>
Answer:
Scout's reference to the mockingbird suggests she
-understand the unfairness of the legal system.
-has developed deeper empathy.
-has come to understand that what is legal isn't necessarily what is right.
Explanation:
Harper Lee's most famous novel "To Kill A Mockingbird" revolves around the lives of the Finches in Maycomb, ALabama. The racist attitude that still seems to persist among the people became one of the main themes of the story.
The character of Jean Louise "Scout" Finch is the little daughter of the lawyer Atticus Finch. She also is the main voice from which the whole narrative of the story is told. Scout referenced the "mockingbird" in chapter 10 when she asked Miss Maudie why they shouldn't shoot mockingbirds. She then told them that mockingbirds do nothing except make music for the enjoyment of the humans. It can be a representation of innocence in itself and so, to kill a mockingbird is to kill innocence.
Then again, Scout used another reference of the mockingbird in chapter 30 for Boo Radley when he was accused of killing Mr. Ewell. When Atticus wanted to claim that Jem did it in self-defense, Heck's opinion was that Mr. Ewell killed himself. This was supported by Scout, who states that letting Boo or Jem be convicted will be like killing a mockingbird.
Thus, Scout's reference to the mockingbird suggests she
understand the unfairness of the legal system.
has developed deeper empathy.
has come to understand that what is legal isn't necessarily what is right.
Answer:that it was deadly
Explanation:
The person that is conducting the analysis if they already know what will happen then their analysis will be different
