1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aliya0001 [1]
3 years ago
10

The process to amend the Texas Constitution is slightly different than that of the U.S. Constitution because __________.

History
2 answers:
Anna71 [15]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Texas Constitution derives its core governing principle from the U.S. Constitution. Both embody representative democracy, popular sovereignty, limited government, and separation of powers. But, in many ways, the documents have major differences. This activity compares and contrasts the U.S. and Texas Constitution

i hope that it is helpful to you please mark it as brainliest.

djverab [1.8K]3 years ago
3 0
The federal Constitution can only be amended through a lengthy process designed to limit changes to this fundamental document. ... State constitutions are more open to amendments. Amendments can be proposed by legislature, a constitutional commission or citizens' petition and can be accepted by referendum.
You might be interested in
Is democracy compatible with economic inequality?
dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

hope the answers helped you. pls mark as brainliest

Explanation:

In 1831, Alexis de Tocqueville took a 10-month trip to the United States to study the American penal system. In the resulting book—Democracy in America—he singled out one noteworthy feature: “Amongst the novel objects that attracted my attention during my stay in the United States, nothing struck me more forcibly than the general equality of conditions.” Although he ignored the fact of slavery, his reference to economic equality among white Americans was, at the time, accurate. According to economic historians Peter H. Lindert and Jeffrey G. Williamson, the share of national income going to the top one percent was less than 10 percent.Today, the share of national income going to the top one percent has doubled, while median wages have remained largely stagnant. In the last 40 years, CEO wages have grown nearly 100 times the rate of wages for average workers. The popularity of left-wing candidates like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders—both with significant redistributive policies at the core of their platform—reflects the moral concerns many have about high levels of income inequality.

But no moral case for economic equality will convince those on the Right. What is at stake is an idea of fairness. It is unfair, so the thought goes, for others to live off one’s labor without making an equally productive contribution to society. This appeal to fairness trumps any moral case for income redistribution. There is, however, another case for relative equality of conditions that appeals to the same idea of fairness that’s appealed to by the opponents of redistribution. This view, which has largely been neglected since Tocqueville’s meditations on the subject, argues that a certain degree of economic equality is necessary for fair participation in political life.

4 0
3 years ago
Can someone answer this plss
gavmur [86]

Answer:

The divide among Americans about the Vietnam War.

Explanation:

The two people are fighting over whether to stay in the war or leave the war, which shows the divide among Americans about the war.

5 0
3 years ago
The Japanese conquest of Singapore was symbolically significant because
Mariana [72]
<span>d. It allowed Japan to demonstrate its abundant and superior technology

</span>The Japanese conquest of Singapore was symbolically significant becauseNOT:
a. It dealt a blow to British prestige and to European superiority in Asia
b. It provided Japan with much needed access to tin, rubber, and petroleum
<span>c. It made the American petoleum embargo obsolete</span>

6 0
3 years ago
HELP QUICKLY WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!
allsm [11]
One of the top professions in ancient Greece was mercenary soldier. After the Peloponnesian War 10,000 Greek mercenaries from all over Greece famously joined a rebellion in the Persian Empire.

After the second Persian invasion of Greece was halted, Sparta withdrew from the Delian League and reformed the Peloponnesian League with its original allies.
Many Greek city-states had been alienated from Sparta following the violent actions of Spartan leader Pausanias during the siege of Byzantium.
Following Sparta’s departure from the Delian League, Athens was able to use the resources of the League to its own ends, which led it into conflict with less powerful members of the League.
The Persian Empire adopted a divide-and-rule strategy in relation to the Greek city-states in the wake of the Persian Wars, stoking already simmering conflicts, including the rivalry between Athens and Sparta, to protect the Persian Empire against further Greek attacks.
4 0
3 years ago
What is a sand painting?
Simora [160]
A cerimonial art form that American Indeans used especially for healing

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why do you think some people claimed that ending slavery would disrupt the economy of the Souther states.
    13·1 answer
  • Why is the Temple Mount a source of argument??
    9·1 answer
  • Match the definitions to the correct word.
    9·1 answer
  • Pls help/
    10·1 answer
  • How did being surrounded by deserts help Egypt?
    9·1 answer
  • Most enslaved people in the south maintained their family histories by
    13·2 answers
  • All Texas legislators are elected using
    5·1 answer
  • What did the cool tempered john adams say about the boston tea party..........?
    5·1 answer
  • ___ is the Norse name for the home of mankind.
    11·2 answers
  • Why do you think King was such a controversial figure in the 1950s and '60s? What do
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!