Answer:
India, Pakistan, and China are unlikely to risk a significant conflict over their competing claims in Kashmir because the three nations are nuclear powers, with which an eventual military conflict in the region could imply a nuclear escalation that would significantly affect global stability. .
Indeed, China is one of the five countries authorized to possess nuclear weapons by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. For their part, both India and Pakistan are not party to the treaty, and have developed their own nuclear weapons.
Thus, China has about 200 active nuclear warheads, Pakistan about 90 and India about 70, that is, the three nations have the possibility of destroying each other if they wish so. And it is precisely this possibility that limits the escalation of conflicts in the region: the fear of being destroyed by the enemy makes the peace to last.
Answer:
Challenges faced by these middle-income countries are a legacy of government economic controls that for political reasons
This number would greatly increase, as there are many nations that don't have their own their own country. Some are part of a bigger country (the Tamils in India) and some are distributed among many countries (the Kurds)
Recognizing all those nations could increase some conflicts, such as that between the Kurds and Turkish in Turkey.
I think that a good definition should acknowledge that some nations have independent states and some are part of another state - the defining characteristics should be a sense of unity among the nation.
The reason why Russia is spoken by a lot of these countries is because Many of these countries use to be part of the Soviet Union.
<h3>What was the Soviet Union?</h3>
This was a socialist and communist republic that existed in Europe for a period of 69 years.
The people had a similar language at the time before it was dissolved in the year 1991.
Read more on the Soviet union here: brainly.com/question/1310325
Elaborate on this a little
