1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oliga [24]
2 years ago
9

Why would a researcher use a primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event?

History
1 answer:
Firlakuza [10]2 years ago
3 0
Because you would want to have a better understanding and from some one who witnessed or they were involved in. Secondary is when you read about something in a book or article,you werent there to see it happen or to actually witness it.
You might be interested in
How do i delete questions lol
SashulF [63]

you can't delete the question

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement about African civilizations before European enslavers arrived in the 1400s is correct?
Daniel [21]

Answer:

The peoples of Africa had rich and diverse histories and cultures centuries before Europeans arrived. Africans had kingdoms and city-states, each with its own language and culture. ... Art, learning and technology flourished, and Africans were especially skilled with medicine, mathematics, and astronomy.

Explanation:

hope this helps

6 0
2 years ago
Germanys reparation payments after world war 1 caused
levacccp [35]

strained the economic system, and the Weimar Republic printed money as the mark's value tumbled

6 0
2 years ago
Who<br> was Jean de la Harpe? I
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:

was a French explorer who is credited with the discovery of Little Rock, Arkansas. He was the first known French explorer to set foot in the future state of Oklahoma.

8 0
3 years ago
The quote below is an excerpt from a speech given by Winston Churchill in 1946:
Alik [6]
<span>Based on what I know about the Cold War and the quote you gave above I would choose this option: It showed that democratic nations were facing a threat from Soviet expansionism. 

Churchill had no plans to attack the Soviets or liberate these states. It was merely about pointing out the spreading of communism and that the western nations should join forces to contain it.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • European cities like Rome Paris and london became major economic and population center because they were founded along or near
    8·2 answers
  • Which did the british do during the buildup to the american revolution?
    7·1 answer
  • The entire South did not succumb to the mystique of cotton. Based on this statement, which of the following is true
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following was included in Reagan's platform during the 1980 presidential election?
    6·2 answers
  • What caused the US Army to take over atomic research in the early 1940s?
    6·2 answers
  • The DEMOCRACY type of
    5·1 answer
  • What are two common key concepts between Christianity and judaism?
    8·2 answers
  • What kind of government is a constitutional monarchy
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement best explains how World War II influenced the economy of Louisiana?
    7·2 answers
  • ( pls help will mark brain!!!) Why did European nations believe they needed massive armies in the early 1900s?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!