Answer:
Civilians were affected by the Siege of Vicksburg because Grant cut off the city by land and Farragut cut off the city by water.
Explanation:
They were all on the outskirt of the two sides and every one of them had motivations to go both routes in the contention.
Maryland was a slave state and from multiple points of view held to an indistinguishable thoughts from the Confederates. The most compelling motivation that they went poorly them is on the grounds that the US government ensured there were a lot of troops there, so Washington DC wasn't cut off amidst Confederate land.
Both Missouri and Kentucky had their own smaller than expected form of the Civil War going, where neighbors battled with neighbors.
I’m not sure if it’s right but I think it’s D I’m not sure :-)
Answer:
The Monroe doctrine stated that the U.S. should use military force to prevent any form of intervention from an European power in the western hemisphere.
The Roosevelt corollary was different in that it allowed European powers to intervene as long as the intervention was considered justified, but not to invade.
This difference became clear during the Venezuelan crisis of 1902-1903, when Germany, Britain, and Italy imposed a naval blockade on Venezuela because the Venezuela president refused to pay for the damages suffered by European citizens during the recent civil war.
At first, Theodore Roosevelt allowed the blockade to continue because he believed that it was justified, but when Germany threatened to invade Venezuela, he intervened sending a fleet under Admiral George Dewey.
