Answer:
grievances against the King of England, ways in which he was violating the natural rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Explanation:
<span>Yes. Look. It's not a popular answer these days to say, "The US is the most powerful nation!" There are a LOT of people who (for varying reasons, many of which are respectable) want this to <span>not </span>be true. But wanting a thing doesn't mean that it's true. Ideology may blind us. And whether you like the US or not, it is the most powerful nation and will be the most powerful nation for a while to come, most of us will be dead when the time comes that it isn't (if ever) and even then —if that happens— it will only be missing that spot by a small margin.This is because the US isn't just the US. Again, I know it's fun to talk about how dumb the US is. It almost falls into that George W. Bush category of disliking a thing so much, that it allows us to say whatever pejorative we want, without regard for intellectual honesty on the matter. But the US ain't dumb. It inherited hegemony from the British Empire and continued that legacy and built a network of incredibly powerful alliances that will not suddenly go away the moment China surpasses the US in general potential.And that's the really important thing to remember, is in understanding what "power" means. I don't deal in predicting the future, but it's pretty obvious that China will continue to grow economically for a generation. It isn't just economic size (the US is losing that status in a few years). China's economy will be bigger NOT because of some magic number, but because of 1.3 billion people multiplied by a really, REALLY low GDP per capita. And that's the thing, how wealthy will the Chinese people get?But most reasonable estimates point out that there is a dangerous point in economies that are really, REALLY tricky to navigate. There's a "glass ceiling" that many countries discover where the high expectations of earnings prevent businesses from investing a lot in their country because it was precisely the low wages those companies were after. This doesn't mean nations can't get there. Spain, Italy, Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea and others have crossed that "glass ceiling" where they moved into fully industrialized economies with nice high per capita incomes.
</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
I don't know if you got your answer but if you didn't get your answer I can give it to you just let me know when you need the answer
Explanation:
Answer:It will require the United States to spend money to defend the islands
Explanation:
Carnegie thinks that occupying the Philippines will cost the United States money because It will make the United States spend money to protect the islands from foreign attacks.
In his quote he says that “Certainly they will be a<em> grievous drain upon revenue </em>if we consider the enormous army and navy which we shall be forced to maintain upon their account. . . .” <em>A grievous drain upon revenue</em> means that the taxpayers’ money will be destined or wasted in trying to keep an army and navy in such a far away place.
