The third or the fourth one. Both are true I think.
On one hand, you have the belief that money could be better spent than assigning it to government relief programs. It states that these funds will unadequately used and will not efectively achieve its original purpose. On the ther hand, you have the belief that more money should be spent in these programs because it will help reduce the issue of inequality. People who recieve this aid will have the chance to improve their quality of life by getting access to better education and health services.
The Homestead Act of 1862 pulled settlers to the plains by offering 160 free acres of federal land to any American, including freed slaves.
Answer
1. It set in a process that led to displacement, removal and relocation of the natives
2. Mining rested on the white American talent for claiming legitimacy
3. Created a rapid urbanization kind of settlement
Explanation
There was a friction between miners and Indians during the rush for Gold mining that resulted into the displacement of the natives. Mining in California rested on the white American talent for claiming legitimacy. This is to say that most of them were newcomers yet it did not prevent them from claiming legitimacy of the place as occupants ignoring natives that had the right to local resources. Mining in the west brought concentrated populations, where the mining patterns of settlements turned out to be the future settlement pattern of the region.
Neither, in all honesty the amount of nuclear explosives both countries have they would completely destroy each other. There would be no winner
