Shakespeare shows that Hamlet would be a good king through his loyalty, compassion and intelligence, however, he would be a bad king because of his indecision and inability to make quick decisions.
<h3>How did Shakespeare build Hamlet?</h3>
- A complex character.
- A nuanced character.
- A character with good and bad attitudes.
- A character with flaws and qualities.
Hamlet is a complex character, as it is difficult to play him singly. The proof of this can be identified by the fact that Hamlet has characteristics that would make him a good king and characteristics that would make him a bad king.
Hamlet is intelligent and has compassion and loyalty, which shows that he would be an exemplary ruler. However, his ability to solve problems is flawed, as he is too indecisive and lacks objectivity.
You can find more information about Hamlet at the link below:
brainly.com/question/8182660
It starts of as:
"a few miles of Soledad, the Salinaa River drops in close to...."
It's Soledad (a costal California city about 210km South of San Francisco) and Gabilan mountains (a small town)
Hope this helps!
What is ur question I can't help if I don't know what u need
Sir Henry Baskerville - The late Sir Charles's nephew and closet living relative. Sir Henry is hale and hearty, described as "a small, alert, dark-eyed man about thirty years of age, very sturdily built." By the end of the story, Henry is as worn out and shell-shocked as his late uncle was before his death.
