Can someone please help

What was reaganomics, and what policies were championed by reagan and passed by congress in support of it? what other actions di

goldfiish [28.3K]

Reaganomics is the economic philosophy of Ronald Reagan that called for less federal government involvement in the economy and less regulation of businesses and corporations. This philosophy was also based around lowering the tax rate and the idea of supply side economics.

Supply side economics focused on the trickle down theory. This idea was that if corporations received tax breaks, they would use this money to hire/pay their workers. In turn, these workers would be able to spend money on goods within the economy. This would keep the economy going strong.

Congress supported these ideas by lowering the federal tax rate and putting less restrictions on businesses and corporations.

5 0

3 years ago

Organized religion became more diverse across the regions of the new nation in the decades after the revolution, suggesting an e

kondaur [170]

Answer:

B.

arrival of a new age of strong national government and economic reform.

Explanation:

i just took the quick check lol

8 0

2 years ago

Hi please help me with me with this quiz it’s called “Drone to the Rescue”

Scorpion4ik [409]

#2 is A and #4 is C the other two I can’t answer w out the text didn’t want to give you the wrong answers for the other two.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the "White Man's Burden?" Why does Kipling regard this as a burden?

Tatiana [17]

<h2>Question:</h2>

What is the "White Man's Burden?" Why does Kipling regard this as a burden?

<h2>Answer:</h2>

It's to celebrates British colonialism as a mission of civilisation that eventually would benefit the colonised natives and the thematically corresponds to Kipling's belief that the British Empire was the Englishman's "Divine Burden to reign God's Empire on Earth". 

The duty of white men to bring education and salvation to people around the world that he deemed uncivilized. Many people, including people of color and anti-imperialists, have called this concept racist.

<h2>#CARRYONLEARNING </h2><h2>#STUDYWELL </h2>

4 0

3 years ago

Why did the Confederacy have so much trouble organizing for the war

astra-53 [7]

The political, economic, and military strength of the Union was much greater than that of the Confederacy. However, the war did last four years. The Confederacy proved itself resilient on many occasions. Throughout the war the tide constantly shifted, and with that so did the political, economic, and military strength of either side. Although each side had its share of military successes, in the end, the superior Northern economy, centralized government and overwhelming manpower would eventually lead to victory. In mid 1863, both the Union and the Confederacy could have won the war although; the Confederacy lacked the industry, or manpower to wage a long war with the Union.

The Union was far more industrialized than the South. The North possessed 80% of total U.S. industry. In addition, most Confederate industry was located in the Upper South-particularly in Virginia. The Confederacy lost a great deal of potential industry and manpower when West Virginia, Kentucky, Delaware, and Maryland joined the Union instead of the Confederacy. The loss of these states to the Union was as much a testament to shrewd northern politics (Maryland) as it was to opposition within the states (West Virginia). Confederate industry, especially with the loss of these states, was unable to compete with the Union.

In addition to the South's lack of industry, most capital was invested in slaves and land-both of these are non-liquid. The South's lack of a large supply of liquid capital made it difficult for Southerners to buy munitions for the war effort. As a result of the South's lack of liquid capital the North enjoyed a decided advantage..

Glad to help :)

-liyah❤

7 0

3 years ago