Answer:
S0vIeT rUsSiA is considered behind the west even after modernizing because their engginering was not that much helpful
Explanation: this helps right give 25 pts plz
The empires that the leaders of the Second Wabe were to rule were much larger than those of the First Wave. The colonies and people were governed from a distance, and <span>leaders </span>achieved the expansion of their empires through wars of conquest. The <span>leaders</span><span> had more military power, over the old divine power, because they
were in command of well-organized armies and fleets of ships to
dominate. Instead of seeing themselves as divinities, the
rulers of the Second Wabe were politicians, who allowed assemblies and
the intervention of the people, like the Greeks. The
new rulers were through politics, the creation of laws, new concepts
such as citizenship in Rome and Greece, as well as the possibility of
not governing for life, but elect leaders, as with the Roman Consuls.</span>
No, it is not true that Stark argues that if one truely believes that ritual is the essence of religion, (and not belief in the supernatural,) then sacrifice is very hard to <span>understand because sacrifice seems irrational, since he believes the two aren't mutually exclusive. </span>
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
prohibition of alcohol (1920–33) the “noble experiment” was undertaken to reduce crime and corruption, solve social problems, reduce the tax burden created by prisons and poorhouses, and improve health and hygiene.
Your 2nd and 3rd options are the correct answers. Monarchies were not quickly changed into democracies because it was much more complicated to change a government. You can't do that overnight.
