Gather or gathering maybe grouping
Answer:
B, Allowing South Carolina to continue to segregate students by meeting the "separate but equal" criteria.
Explanation:
As shown in the question above, the education-related equalization effort that took place in South Carolina was a government program that aimed to build countless schools across the country, with the aim of providing quality education to the entire population regardless of the skin color of children. people.
This seems like a noble attitude, however this program was established to allow the state to segregate people based on their color. Using the criterion "separate, but equal", schools were built where only white students were accepted, black students, however, would have access to other schools that would only allow black students, but that would provide the same level of education and resources as schools for white students.
In this way, the state would provide education for young blacks, but would maintain the concept of racial segregation.
Answer:
in France there was a very strong support of extreme right (this terms is quite broad and does not include so-called nazism) already before the Great War. After 1870 French extreme right became quite powerful and had a stimulating support of intellectuals (Barres, Maurras) who were able to stimulate new generations ...a big part of intellectual elite invited Mussolini´s coup and in 30s there was a hayday of French right. When Hitler came in poweŕ, he had a strong support among French. But French extreme-right was frequently more conservative than modern (nazism).
Explanation:
Jacques Doriot (leader and founder of PPF), writer Pierre Drieu la Rochelle, Robert Brasillach or Céline had many motives to support nazism. They believed in something that could be called "revolution of the body and instinct", the criticized democracy of the IIIrd republic because of its liberalism and intellectualism. They wanted strong leader and politics of body and instinct. But they were never united. In the government there was a division between "marchalistes" (followers of Pétain) and "lavalistes" (folloowers of pro-nazi laval).
