What must the government prove when taking a case before the grand jury?

1 answer:

3 0

The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi) is the duty of a party in a trial to produce the evidence that will prove the claims they have made against the other party. In a legal dispute, one party is initially presumed to be correct and gets the benefit of the doubt, while the other side bears the burden of proof. When a party bearing the burden of proof meets their burden, the burden of proof switches to the other side. Burdens may be of different kinds for each

You might be interested in

The Indian conflicts led to well-organized ______ in every colony.

erica [24]

Answer: militias

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

The average person will eat over 3,000 of these over the course of their life, what is it?

kifflom [539]

Hello :)

A chocolate bar tbh, probably more if we’re being honest.

3 0

3 years ago

The news media sometimes report functional brain imaging findings accurately, but often report them in oversimplified ways, such

mrs_skeptik [129]

Answer: The objective of this analysis is to review a spectrum of functional brain imaging technologies to identify whether there are any imaging modalities that are more effective than others for various brain pathology conditions. This evidence-based analysis reviews magnetoencephalography (MEG), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), positron emission tomography (PET), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for the diagnosis or surgical management of the following conditions: Alzheimer’s disease (AD), brain tumors, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis (MS), and Parkinson’s disease (PD).

The reporter interpreted the findings correctly. In Ontario, there will be an estimated 950 new cases and 580 deaths due to brain cancer in 2006. Treatments for brain tumors include surgery and radiation therapy. However, one of the limitations of radiation therapy is that it damages tissue though necrosis and scarring. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may not distinguish between radiation effects and resistant tissue, creating a potential role for functional brain imaging.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

6. The decision in Stanford v. Kentucky was overturned by the Supreme Court's ruling in Roper v. Simmons. Describe how this late

Lilit [14]

Answer: The correct answer is : Cristopher Simmons was sentenced to death when he was 17 in 1993. Several appeals were made until 2002 but all were rejected, in this year the Supreme Court of Missouri suspended the execution of Simmons. The United States Supreme Court ruled that executing the mentally handicapped violated the prohibitions of the eighth and fourteenth amendments. Because of this in Missouri it was decided to reconsider the Simmons case. The Missouri court invalidated the decision taken in 1989 in the Stanford v. Kentucky as it claimed that the execution of minors was not unconstitutional and it was concluded that it was cruel and unusual.

8 0

3 years ago

Even though a small number of people have been trained academically as sociologists, we can all be described as everyday sociolo

wariber [46]

We can all be described as everyday sociologists because: we are all members or society and so have a great deal of background knowledge about<span> how society works
To actually live as a member of society, humans are forced to adapt to the situations around us that make us to constantly analyze people behavior from our day to day activities in order to make our lives easier.</span>

3 0

3 years ago